NBAA Welcomes Naples Court of Appeals Decision | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

AMA Drone Report

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday

Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On ANN

ADR 02.27.17

Airborne 02.27.17

Airborne 02.28.17

Airborne 02.22.17

Airborne 02.23.17

Airborne 02.24.17

Airborne-HD On YouTube

ADR 02.27.17

Airborne 02.27.17

Airborne 02.28.17

Airborne 02.22.17

Airborne 02.23.17

Airborne 02.24.17

Tue, Jun 07, 2005

NBAA Welcomes Naples Court of Appeals Decision

Upholds FAA Authority to Withhold Grants for Unreasonable Restrictions on Aircraft Access

NBAA has welcomed a court decision upholding authority for the FAA to take action against unreasonable restrictions on certain types of business aircraft. At the same time, the Association's enthusiasm was tempered by some of the specifics related to the case.

The decision, issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on June 3, resulted from court proceedings to determine whether a ban on Stage 2 aircraft at Naples Airport was unreasonable, as the FAA claimed. “Stage 2” refers to an FAA designation related to the decibel level at which an aircraft operates.

In 2002, the FAA began withholding federal funding for Naples Airport as an enforcement action against the Stage 2 ban, which was put in place by the Florida city's Airport Authority. In taking the enforcement action, the FAA maintained that the noise ban at Naples was in violation of the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, which stipulates that airports must be “available for public use on reasonable conditions and without unjust discrimination” in order to be eligible for federal grant funds. NBAA submitted an amicus brief in the court proceeding supporting the FAA's position.

For its part, the Airport Authority contended that once an airport completed the FAA's procedures for reviewing airport restrictions (known as the Part 161 process), the Agency lost its ability to take enforcement action on the airport's Stage 2 ban.  In the opinion issued last week, the court stated that it would “…defer to the FAA's determination that it retains that power.”

“NBAA is pleased that the court recognized and preserved the FAA's authority to withhold federal funding from airports that impose unreasonable restrictions on aircraft,” said NBAA President and CEO Ed Bolen. “Airports that receive federal funding and are available for public use should not unjustly discriminate against certain types of aircraft.  With its decision last week, the court signaled its agreement with that principle.”

Last week's ruling was only a partial victory for business aircraft operators, because the court's ruling also concluded that, in this specific instance, the Naples Airport Authority provided “ample evidence” that its ban on Stage 2 aircraft is reasonable. In its ruling, the court stated that the FAA had not adequately explained why the Stage 2 ban at Naples was unreasonable, and the case was sent back to the FAA for further consideration of the facts underlying the Agency's unreasonableness determination.

“NBAA respectfully disagrees with the court's conclusion that the FAA lacked evidence supporting its determination that the Stage 2 ban at Naples Airport was unreasonable,” Bolen continued.

“At the same time, the court's decision preserves the integrity of the uniform, fact-based, federal process in place for review of airport restrictions, and underscores the premise that this process is the proper way to approach airport access restrictions.  That approach has worked well for many years, and continues to work well today. With its decision, the court recognized that this is the case, and that is a 'win' for the business aviation community.”

FMI: http://web.nbaa.org/public/ops/airports/apf/decision20050603.pdf, http://web.nbaa.org/public/ops/airports/apf

Advertisement

More News

SpaceX To Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond The Moon Next Year

Two Private Citizens Have Paid A 'Significant Deposit' To Fly In Space Aboard Dragon 2 SpaceX has been approached to fly two private citizens on a trip around the moon late next ye>[...]

AMA Drone Report 02.27.17: DJI Rumors, UAV Sighting Report, Another City Ban

Also: Hover Camera Passport, Utah Drone Festival, An Early Report on AMA Expo East Generating buzz is good marketing, and DJI was doing so with a Tweet announcing new products for >[...]

AMA Drone Report 02.27.17: DJI Rumors, UAV Sighting Report, Another City Ban

Also: Hover Camera Passport, Utah Drone Festival, An Early Report on AMA Expo East Generating buzz is good marketing, and DJI was doing so with a Tweet announcing new products for >[...]

Airborne 02.27.17: Skydive Myrtle Beach, P-51 Mustangs!, Piper Positive

Also: ANN's Infamous April 1st Edition, Giant OV-10, Thrush 510P, Aerojet Rocketdyne, FAI Air Ambulance, Daher, NASA Art Following years of egregious county misbehavior, the owner >[...]

Airborne 02.27.17: Skydive Myrtle Beach, P-51 Mustangs!, Piper Positive

Also: ANN's Infamous April 1st Edition, Giant OV-10, Thrush 510P, Aerojet Rocketdyne, FAI Air Ambulance, Daher, NASA Art Following years of egregious county misbehavior, the owner >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2017 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC