NATA Demands Postponement Of FAA Landing Performance Notice | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

AMA Drone Report

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday

Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI

Airborne On ANN

AMA 06.22.17

Airborne 06.26.17

Airborne 06.27.17

Airborne 06.28.17

Airborne 06.22.17

Airborne 06.23.17

Airborne-Unmanned 06.27.17

Airborne-YouTube

AMA 06.22.17

Airborne 06.26.17

Airborne 06.27.17

Airborne 06.28.17

Airborne 06.22.17

Airborne 06.23.17

Airborne-Unmanned 06.27.17

XPONENTIAL Innovation Preview -- www.allthingsunmanned.com

Fri, Aug 11, 2006

NATA Demands Postponement Of FAA Landing Performance Notice

In a letter to FAA Administrator Marion Blakey, NATA has requested that the agency delay implementation of the recent notice announcing a new policy requiring landing performance assessments prior to landing for all turbojet aircraft.

According to the notice, all Part 121, 135 and 91(K) operators will be issued a new Operation Specification (OpSpec) or Management Specification (MSpec), as appropriate, requiring completion of a new en-route landing distance assessment for all turbojet aircraft. This calculation must take into consideration current runway conditions and allow a full stop landing with at least a 15% safety margin beyond the actual landing distance. The calculation must also occur as close to the time of arrival as practicable.

Currently, regulations only mandate that such calculations occur prior to departure of the aircraft. NATA’s letter states, “The policy change detailed in the notice is, at best, ambiguous and confusing. At worst, it is rulemaking by Guidance and OpSpec/MSpec. The association has, both through comments attached to this letter and through personal meetings with FAA staff, outlined several concerns with the content of this notice that have yet to be answered.

“On a basic level, NATA is opposed to the issuance of this “policy” because it establishes a new requirement with which operators must comply without having gone through the formal rulemaking process. Currently, the conduct of a separate landing assessment, particularly when coupled with a mandatory 15% margin, is not required by regulation. To impose such a specific and detailed new process on operators without following the mandates of the Administrative Procedures Act is unacceptable to the association.”

NATA also points to the Part 121 origination of this new policy, and the agency’s blatant disregard for the unique characteristics of 135 and 91(K) operations. The letter cites several examples of FAA oversight in developing the policy, including operations at uncontrolled airports (or airports where the tower has closed), unreliable or unavailable braking action reports, and lack of friction measuring equipment at many airports frequented by on-demand charter and fractional operators. The FAA policy notice does not provide clear guidance to operators and flight crews as to how to determine braking action under these circumstances and whether a landing is permissible given these facts.

The association closed its letter by requesting that the FAA postpone distribution of the OpSpec/MSpec and related guidance for a minimum of 60 days to allow the agency to address these concerns and encouraging the agency to form a joint industry/FAA working group to discuss the notice.

“Although the FAA’s goal of increased aviation safety through a standardized landing margin is laudable, this Part 121-driven and oriented notice could actually diminish aviation safety for Parts 135, 125, and 91(K) operators. The FAA appears to have developed a case of “tunnel vision” and can only see the perceived benefits of this new policy, and appears to have not considered the possible unintended safety consequences of their actions. Ultimately, the flying public could be the ones who suffer,” explained NATA President James K. Coyne (pictured above).

FMI: www.nata.aero

Advertisement

More News

ANN's 2017 AirVenture Innovation Preview is Going To Be A Stunner!

Early Confirmations Show An Amazing Assortment of Exciting New Products and Technologies! It may be the most impressive line-up of new technology to ever be featured in our Innovat>[...]

Airborne 06.27.17: SpaceX Doubles!, Sean Tucker Retirement, FA Changes

Also: Shoreham Update, Aero-Calendar, AUVSI, Fighter Pilots, André Borschberg, Airport Crimes, Drone Conference SpaceX, in the midst of a greatly accelerated launch pace, pu>[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 06.27.17: AUVSI On Senate Bill, Intel Olympics, NIGHTWARDEN

Also: DRL Winner $$, Kespry Enters Insurance Sector, Drone Sim Market, Automated Vehicles Symposium Brian Wynne, president and CEO of AUVSI, issued a statement on the unmanned airc>[...]

AMA Drone Report 06.22.17: FAA Reauthorization, Rotor Riot Int'l, DRL on ESPN

Also: Drones at Oshkosh!, Drone Regulatory Effort, AMA Drone Report-Help Wanted, Aero-TV: MultiGP Drone Racing The House of Representatives has published initial language to reauth>[...]

U.S. Rocketry Students Impress At Internationals, Win Gold

Students From Festus, MO Become Third Consecutive U.S. Team To Take Top Spot The 10-student team from Festus High School in Festus, MO bested the world's best rocketry teams and to>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2017 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC