FAA Proposes Civil Fines Against Parachute Center, Corporate Air | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

AMA Drone Report

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday

Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI

Airborne On ANN

AMA 08.17.17

Airborne 08.14.17

Airborne 08.15.17

Airborne 08.16.17

Airborne 08.17.17

Airborne 08.18.17

Airborne-Unmanned 08.15.17

Airborne-YouTube

AMA 08.17.17

Airborne 08.14.17

Airborne 08.15.17

Airborne 08.16.17

Airborne 08.17.17

Airborne 08.18.17

Airborne-Unmanned 08.15.17

NEW!!! 2017 AirVenture Innovation Preview -- YouTube Presentation / Vimeo Presentation

Thu, Oct 14, 2010

FAA Proposes Civil Fines Against Parachute Center, Corporate Air

Cites Use Of Unsafe Jump Aircraft, Improper Maintenance

The FAA has proposed fines against two unrelated aviation companies for alleged aircraft safety violations.

A $664,000 civil penalty has been proposed against William C. Dause, doing business as The Parachute Center of Acampo, CA, for allegedly failing to perform required aircraft parts replacements and failing to comply with safety directives.

"Putting parachutists at risk by neglecting to follow safety procedures is unacceptable," said U.S. Transportation Secretary LaHood. "We expect aircraft operators to comply with our safety rules and will take enforcement action when they do not."


Secretary LaHood

The FAA alleges that The Parachute Center operated a DeHavilland DHC-6 Twin Otter when critical parts were well past their life limits and without inspecting portions of the wings for corrosion. In all, the FAA alleges that The Parachute Center operated the aircraft on approximately 2,121 flights between March 21, 2008 and November 4, 2009 with elevator control cables that were overdue for replacement and when the plane was not in compliance with Airworthiness Directives requiring visual inspections of the wing main spar, lower spar cap extensions and wing support strut for possible corrosion. The FAA also alleges that the company operated the aircraft on at least 500 flights between April 16, 2009 and November 4, 2009 with aileron control cables that were overdue for replacement.


Twin Otter File Photo

In a separate matter, the agency has also proposed a $455,175 civil penalty against Corporate Air of Billings, MT, for allegedly operating a Beech 1900C airliner when it was not in compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations.

We expect airlines to comply with these rules and will take enforcement action when they do not," said Secretary LaHood.

The FAA alleges Corporate Air failed to maintain the aircraft under the company's general maintenance manual, which includes the Pratt & Whitney Canada maintenance manual for the aircraft's turboprop engines. Specifically, the FAA alleges that Corporate Air operated the aircraft on at least 80 flights in spite of continued evidence of excessive oil consumption by the right engine. The FAA-approved aircraft and engine manuals call for post-flight inspection and repair of an engine experiencing excessive oil consumption. Corporate Air did not correct the oil consumption problem despite repeated inspections in which oil had to be added.

Corporate Air operates charter and air taxi service under Part 135 of the Federal Aviation Regulations.


FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt

"Passengers and crew have to be able to trust that an operator has done the right thing and has complied with all the rules," said FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt. "Safety and compliance are the right choices, every time."

Both the Parachute Center and Corporate Air have 30 days from the receipt of the FAA's enforcement letter to respond to the agency.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (08.20.17)

“The F-106 was ahead of its time... Performance-wise, I felt it was comparable to the (F-15) Eagle. It kept us busy back then. We were accomplishing 20-plus sorties on a dail>[...]

RFP: ANN Seeking New Site/Facility For Major Studio Upgrade

It's Official: Aggressive Upgrades For New Airborne Programs WILL Require New Digs It's been in development for years, but we're getting to a point where we think we can pull off s>[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 08.15.17: Reno Drone Races, DoD CrackDown, Blue Angels v UAV?

Also: Kansas DOT-AirMap, CIRRUAS Drone Program, Daytona Beach PD UAS, Virginia UAS SAR The Reno Air Racing Association has signed an agreement with the MultiGP Drone Racing League >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (08.20.17)

Aero Linx: Wings of Freedom Aviation Museum The Delaware Valley Historical Aircraft Association Harold F. Pitcairn Wings of Freedom Aviation Museum is a 501(c)3 nonprofit, all-volu>[...]

AMA Drone Report 08.17.17: MULTI-GP Int'l Open, Drone v Chicago, Reno Drone Race

Also: Yuneec Extended Service Plan, UAV on A/C Carrier, Blue Angels Incident, Drone Operator Safety Act MultiGP’s 2017 MultiGP International Open, conducted on the grounds of>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2017 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC