SNC Files Action To Reinstate Light Air Support Contract | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Airborne On ANN

Airborne 09.26.16

Airborne 09.27.16

Airborne 09.28.16

Airborne 09.29.16

Airborne 09.23.16

Airborne Hi-Def On YouTube

Airborne 09.26.16

Airborne 09.27.16

Airborne 09.28.16

Airborne 09.29.16

Airborne 09.23.16

Thu, Jun 14, 2012

SNC Files Action To Reinstate Light Air Support Contract

Company Seeks to Maintain Fairness, Transparency Of Acquisition Process

In response to the lawsuit filed by Hawker Beechcraft, Sierra Nevada Corporation (SNC) filed an action in the United States Court of Federal Claims Tuesday to seek reinstatement of the U.S. Air Force (USAF) Light Air Support (LAS) contract awarded to the company last December. SNC partnered with Embraer to provide the A-29 Super Tucano for the LAS mission. Following a lawsuit by the disqualified competitor, the USAF set aside the contract in March and opened a Commander Directed Investigation (CDI) into the source selection process. According to SNC the cancellation of the contract was an extreme response to what appears to be paperwork errors on the part of the USAF. Moreover, the revised Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the USAF is tilted in favor of the competition.

“SNC does not have a history of litigation. We are taking this step only after very serious deliberation and exhausting the other avenues available to us to address our concerns,” said Taco Gilbert, Vice President of ISR Business Development at SNC. “Despite repeated written and verbal attempts, we have not received adequate explanation – much less justification – for the termination of our contract, the reopening of the LAS competition or the readmission to the LAS competition of our competitor whose submission was previously found to be technically deficient and carry unacceptable mission capability risk.”

“What we seek is a fair and open competition – one where there is a level playing field, one that provides transparency into the decision making process, and one that selects the best value as required by the Request for Proposal. Unfortunately, based on the information we have, we are concerned that this competition will not conform to these goals,” said Gilbert.

SNC’s filing also raises specific concerns with the source selection process and revisions to Amendment 8 of the RFP. The new source selection process eliminates any flight demonstration/evaluation and moves the completion of First Article Test (FAT) of production aircraft out until delivery in July 2014.  Early FAT is not a concern with the A-29, but is not possible for Hawker Beechcraft’s AT-6B which is not in production. Under the current plan, the first opportunity the Air Force will have to test the LAS aircraft is not until it has been purchased and produced. The original source selection process included flight demonstrations of training and combat mission profiles and austere field operations. The competition sought non-developmental aircraft, which by definition should be available for evaluation. SNC is very concerned that this is a similar situation to the one recently described by Secretary Frank Kendall, the Pentagon's Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, who said putting an aircraft into production prior to the first test flight is “acquisition malpractice.”

“It is unfathomable that the Air Force won’t test this aircraft until it is past the point of no return, especially when one of the aircraft in the competition is still developmental,” Gilbert said. “This has happened only rarely in DoD aircraft acquisitions and it has usually turned out very poorly for both the warfighter and the taxpayer.  The Department of Defense insists on test driving ground equipment before it buys it, but now proposes not to test an airplane before purchase. One can only guess what this could end up costing the taxpayer in the future.”

As noted in the Government Accountability Office decision, the USAF concluded that the AT-6 had “multiple deficiencies and significant weaknesses” which made it “technically unacceptable and result[ed] in unacceptable mission capability risk.”  Given that there are no changes to the technical requirements in the new RFP and Hawker Beechcraft’s own admission that it cannot meet the LAS requirements, a flight evaluation is the only way to thoroughly and accurately assess technical capability and risk, and eliminate the earlier concerns about SNC’s competitor.

Amendment 8 also now allows improvements that were made to the aircraft since the original source selection to be admitted into consideration. This also creates an unlevel playing field tilted in the favor of Hawker Beechcraft. The company performed development and testing operations on its AT-6 aircraft with millions of dollars of Air Force Title 10 funding during the on-going evaluation process, and continues to do so. This government funded activity, which also involved Air National Guard pilots and use of Air Force ranges, is now eligible to be unfairly admitted for consideration.

FMI: www.sncorp.com

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 09.28.16: NEW DJI Mavic!, EAA's Next STC, Sean Tucker Honored

Also: LA Times v SMO, APS UAT Program, Gordon Bennett 2016, Tucson Control Tower, Hubble Find, Southwest Airlines, Iowa State Another new small unmanned aerial system is now on the>[...]

AeroSports Update: Sean Tucker Is Honored By The CAF

Aerobatic Pilot Sean Tucker Receives The 2016 Lloyd P. Nolen Lifetime Achievement In Aviation Award Aerobatic pilot Sean D. Tucker has been named the recipient of the Lloyd P. Nole>[...]

Elon Musk Outlines Vision For Martian City

Rockets Carrying As Many As 200 People Could Leave For The Neighboring Planet In 'Decades' No one can deny that Elon Musk thinks big, and in a speech at the International Astronaut>[...]

Dutch Investigators Release Findings In MH17 Shootdown

Determines That The Missile 'Came From Russia' The Buk missile that destroyed Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over eastern Ukraine in 2014 came from Russia, according to a Dutch-led >[...]

ForeFlight, SiriusXM Introduce Satellite Aviation Weather Service

Weather And Other Key Information Available Using The SXAR1 Portable Receiver Today ForeFlight and SiriusXM introduced SiriusXM Aviation weather service on the newest version of Fo>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2016 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC