Florida Family Sues FAA Over Aircraft Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Aug 04, 2015

Florida Family Sues FAA Over Aircraft Accident

Airplane Impacted Home In Palm Coast, FL

The sons of a Florida woman who was fatally injured in an accident in Palm Coast, FL in which an airplane impacted a house in January, 2013 have filed a wrongful death lawsuit naming the FAA as a defendant.

Charisse Peoples was one of three people fatally injured in the accident. According to a report from television station WFTV, an attorney for the family said that the pilot of the Beech H35 Bonanza had advised air traffic controllers that he was experiencing engine problems with the aircraft and vibration from the propellers. The suit alleges that the controllers did not vector the airplane to the nearest airport using the most direct route.

Attorney Timothy Loranger told the station that the pilot was told to land at Flagler airport when Ormond Beach was closer. Loranger said it is likely that the plane could have landed safely at Ormond Beach, but it went down less than a mile from Flagler airport, impacting the home. One person in the home at the time of the accident escaped uninjured.

The FAA said it would not comment on the suit.

The NTSB determined the probable cause of the accident was "total loss of engine power after the failure of the No. 4 connecting rod due to oil starvation, which resulted in a subsequent forced landing. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s failure to clearly state that the aircraft had lost all power and the air traffic controllers’ incomplete understanding of the emergency, which resulted in the controllers vectoring the airplane too far from the airport to reach the runway."

The NTSB's determination is not admissible as evidence in court.

(Image of damaged home from YouTube)

FMI: www.ntsb.gov/_layouts/ntsb.aviation/brief.aspx?ev_id=20130104X61334&key=1

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC