Boeing, Spirit, Ask Judge To Dismiss Age Discrimination Suit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Aug 06, 2009

Boeing, Spirit, Ask Judge To Dismiss Age Discrimination Suit

Companies Say Suit Has No Merit, Filed Late

Boeing and Spirit Aerosystems have filed papers asking a federal judge to not grant class-action status in a suit brought by former Boeing employees who lost their jobs when Spirit bought Boeing facilities in Kansas and Oklahoma in 2005. The workers claim Spirit, which was formed by its parent company Onex Corporation of Canada after the sale, did not re-hire some Boeing workers because of their age, denying them pension benefits.

According to the Associated Press, Boeing and Spirit have filed over 900 pages of documents supporting their claim that Spirit had legitimate reasons for not re-hiring some employees. The case is being considered in U.S. District Court in Wichita.

In the court papers, the companies claim that Spirit had a need for its workforce to "be flexible and possess the skills and attitude necessary to give the new venture the best chance of success." They also say the lawsuit was not filed on time.

The former workers, for their part, cite internal memos suggesting that Spirit cut older workers, generally between the ages of 45 and 54, in a "selective re-hire" process. Workers in that age group reportedly were considered the most expensive to retain.

Boeing and Spirit counter with an argument that 85 percent of the workforce over age 40 was recommended for re-hire. About 90 former employees have filed the suit, seeking reinstatement to their positions and $1.5 billion in punitive damages, well as unspecified compensatory damages.

FMI: www.ksd.uscourts.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC