Some Say Aviation More Damaging To Environment Than First Thought | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date






Airborne On ANN

Airborne 10.17.16

Airborne 10.18.16

Airborne 10.19.16

Airborne 10.20.16

Airborne 10.21.16

Airborne Hi-Def On YouTube

Airborne 10.17.16

Airborne 10.18.16

Airborne 10.19.16

Airborne 10.20.16

Airborne 10.21.16

Fri, Aug 17, 2007

Some Say Aviation More Damaging To Environment Than First Thought

Measuring Aviation's Effect On Climate "Complicated"

Some experts now say aviation is possibly a bit more dangerous to the environment than widely thought... not only due to carbon dioxide emissions, but also to the other gases emitted as well. The experts believe these gases warm the earth.

"Growth is going to continue, but it is complicated to estimate the effect of aviation on the climate," said Ivar Isaksen, a professor at Oslo University. He is also an expert in aviation effects on the atmosphere, according to Reuters.

Isaksen contends the impact of aviation on the environment goes far beyond carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, which is what governments use for calculations.

Reuters reports the problem with aviation emissions may be amplified by such things as nitrogen oxides that trap heat and are more damaging at high altitudes. Then there's cirrus clouds that usually warms the Earth's surface. Jet condensation trails could possibly be helping to form a literal blanket of cirrus clouds at high altitudes. 

UN studies have pointed out that aviation is responsible for roughly two percent of the world's carbon dioxide emissions and annual passenger growth of five percent will surpass any efficiency gains from better aircraft design or fuel.

"The science around this isn't very clear," said CarbonNeutral spokesperson Sarah Brown. CarbonNeutral is an offset company that lets interested travelers invest in renewable energy projects designed to absorb aviation emissions.

Another UN report completed in May by its climate panel said including the aviation industry in a greenhouse gas trading scheme as well as extra fuel charges "would have the potential to reduce emissions considerably," Reuters reported.

"A first possible approach is where initially only carbon dioxide from aviation is included in for example an emission trading system," the report said.

"We're trying to estimate the overall effect," said Robert Muller at Germany's Atmosfair, a company that allows people to pay for the greenhouse gases they are responsible for. The money is then invested in climate protection projects.

CarbonNeutral estimates each passenger flying from Sydney to London is responsible for a little more than two tons of greenhouse gases, at a cost of about S28 to offset.



More News

Airborne 10.21.16: NIMBYs Out Of Control, SMO Evictions On Hold, New Race Class

Also: CVR/FDR Expansion, Focusing On Santa Monica, NASAO Boss, GE9X Engine, 1000th H-60M, Verizon Drones, New LAS ATC A Transportation Safety Board of Canada team is currently inve>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.23.16)

Aero-News Quote of the Day "Think of this transition as changing an engine on a plane when it's inflight. Rolling out STARS in our nation's busiest airspaces, without disrupting ai>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (10.23.16)

Aero Linx: The Society of United States Air Force Flight Surgeons (SoUSAFFS) SoUSAFFS was established in 1960 to more specifically support the USAF FS than AsMA at large could. Sin>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.23.16): Final Approach Point

Final Approach Point The point, applicable only to a nonprecision approach with no depicted FAF (such as an on airport VOR), where the aircraft is established inbound on the final >[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN!>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus





© 2007 - 2016 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC