DHS Eyes Missile Defense For Airlines | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Nov 13, 2003

DHS Eyes Missile Defense For Airlines

But It'll Take More Than Two Years To Get 'Em On Board

 
By this time next month, we should have some idea of who the government will tap to build an anti-missile system for the seven-thousand aircraft commercial US fleet. But it will be years before we see any fruit from this labor.
 
The Department of Homeland Security says it will award preliminary contracts to one or more of the following:
  • Northrop Grumman
  • Raytheon and Elta Systems Ltd., a unit of state-controlled Israel Aircraft Industries
  • Alliant Techsystems
  • and the U.S. unit of Britain's BAE Systems
 
The winner(s) will work on adapting existing anti-missile defense systems now used on military aircraft for civilian use.  After that, the government will give contractors 18 months to develop prototypes. Over the next two years, Uncle Sam will spend $100 million on these efforts.
 
That kind of money -- $100 million -- doesn't sound like much at the outset. But consider it an investment. Elta says it's already equipping two Israeli jetliners with its proprietary system at a cost of more than $1 million per aircraft. The carriers themselves will foot the bill beyond the first two installations. Bring the concept to America and do the math: $1 million each for 7,000 aircraft.
 
Yikes. That's a lot of dough.
It's even more if you consider that military-style missile defense system have to be replaced about once every 100 flight hours. That means more mechanics and other associated costs -- you're talking upwards of $15 billion a year, according to one estimate. Think about saddling the commercial aviation industry -- already struggling in the wake of September 11th -- with that kind of cost. It might be a good idea to start investing in Amtrak about now...
FMI: www.dhs.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.16.24)

Aero Linx: International Business Aviation Council Ltd IBAC promotes the growth of business aviation, benefiting all sectors of the industry and all regions of the world. As a non->[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.16.24)

"During the annual inspection of the B-24 “Diamond Lil” this off-season, we made the determination that 'Lil' needs some new feathers. Due to weathering, the cloth-cove>[...]

Airborne 04.10.24: SnF24!, A50 Heritage Reveal, HeliCycle!, Montaer MC-01

Also: Bushcat Woes, Hummingbird 300 SL 4-Seat Heli Kit, Carbon Cub UL The newest Junkers is a faithful recreation that mates a 7-cylinder Verner radial engine to the airframe offer>[...]

Airborne 04.12.24: SnF24!, G100UL Is Here, Holy Micro, Plane Tags

Also: Seaplane Pilots Association, Rotax 916’s First Year, Gene Conrad After a decade and a half of struggling with the FAA and other aero-politics, G100UL is in production a>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 04.17.24: Feds Need Controllers, Spirit Delay, Redbird

Also: Martha King Scholarship, Montaer Grows, Textron Updates Pistons, FlySto The FAA is hiring thousands of air traffic controllers, but the window to apply will only be open for >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC