Analysts Say Boeing Strike Could Go The Distance | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Sep 08, 2008

Analysts Say Boeing Strike Could Go The Distance

But That Delay Could Help One Troubled Program

As workers represented by the International Association of Machinists began their first week walking the picket lines outside Boeing plants in Washington, Oregon and Kansas, analysts and industry pundits seem to agree the walkout will last at least a month... but after that, it's anybody's guess.

If history is a guide, the strike won't last much longer than a couple of months. Bloomberg reports IAM has walked out over three of its last six contracts with Boeing, ranging from 28 to 68 days.

"I would expect this one's going to be long," said longtime Seattle-based aviation consultant Scott Hamilton. "There are some pretty serious issues that they're pretty far apart on."

As ANN reported, Boeing offered machinists an 11 percent raise over three years, as well as bonuses and a double-digit percent gain in pension payments. Union workers wanted a 13 percentage raise, and concessions from Boeing involving limits to outsourced manufacturing. The IAM also called for a stronger health plan, and guarantees from the planemaker that new hires would receive similar benefits to their more tenured counterparts.

IAM workers overwhelmingly rejected the Boeing contract last week... and both sides have adopted a harsh line. On the surface it appears Boeing and IAM are indeed far apart on several issues; how much of that is substantive, though, remains to be seen... and time may be the only force able to cut through the bombast.

"It's hard to tell what's posturing and what's an unbridgeable gap," said noted Teal Group analyst Richard Aboulafia. "In a few weeks, cooler heads might begin to reassess," though he also acknowledged the latest strike "seems a little worse than most."

Boeing appears well-positioned to weather the storm in the short-term. The company has healthy cash reserves, stemming from three consecutive years of record sales and healthy delivery backlogs. Conversely, Boeing isn't able to collect full payment on its planes until they're delivered... and with lines shut down for the foreseeable future, few deliveries are imminent.

Analysts say Boeing's inability to deliver aircraft adds up to about $100 million in losses for each day the strike wears on. A significant chunk of that total comes from lost revenue, though much of it also comes from running idle plants and continuing to pay non-IAM workers.

If there's one bright side for Boeing, however, it is that the planemaker will not need to compensate customers for additional delays caused by the strike.  Such provisions are common in airliner purchase agreements... and for one Boeing program, it could be a blessing in disguise.

The longer the strike wears on, the better the chances Boeing will be forced to once again delay deliveries of its troubled Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Unless the strike is resolved this week, it already seems likely the first 787 flight -- currently scheduled for November -- will be pushed off until after the first of the year.

While such a delay would be yet another black mark for the troubled composite-bodied airliner, the strike also gives Boeing some additional breathing room in allowing its suppliers to catch up on parts deliveries... essentially free time at that, since Boeing wouldn't have to pay eager customers additional concessions for missed deadlines.

Machinists maintain that if Boeing hadn't outsourced production of so many components of the 787, however, the company wouldn't need to now weigh out the pro's and con's of such a scenario in the first place.

"It was a major mistake for the company to fall so far behind on this program," striking machinist Dewayne Roberts said of the 787, to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. "If we had built it, the 787 would be flying by now."

FMI: www.boeing.com, www.goiam.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.14.24)

Aero Linx: Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) The Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) is the Training and Safety arm of the Soaring Society of America (SSA). Our mission is to provide ins>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: 'We're Surviving'-- Kyle Franklin Describes Airshow Life 2013

From 2013 (YouTube Version): Dracula Lives On Through Kyle Franklin... and We're NOT Scared! ANN CEO and Editor-in-Chief, Jim Campbell speaks with Aerobatic and airshow master, Kyl>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC