ESA Receives An Orbital Call For Help | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Oct 23, 2008

ESA Receives An Orbital Call For Help

XMM-Newton Sending Faintest Of Radio Signals

The European Space Agency reports it lost contact with its XMM-Newton X-ray observatory last weekend. Many space agencies and organizations are now joining forces trying to fix the problem... the second major technical glitch to strike an orbital observatory in as many months.

As ANN reported, NASA was forced to delay a scheduled repair mission to the Hubble Space Telescope, after the failure of the observatory's command and data-handling system in late September. NASA was finally able switch on a backup system Thursday, that should return Hubble to near-full operations.

Things appear even more dire for the XMM-Newton, though there are signs of life: a feeble radio signal has been heard, and ground observations confirm that the spacecraft is intact.

XMM-Newton has operated faultlessly in orbit for almost nine years, close to its 10-year design lifetime. In that time, it has become a workhorse of modern astronomy ...and so when it is in trouble, ESA says it is a case of "all hands to the pumps," with all available resources called to help.

During the evening of October 18, XMM-Newton was approaching the point of closest approach to Earth, or perigee, along its 48-hour highly elongated orbit around Earth. At that time, it was communicating normally with the Santiago ground station in Chile through one of its two antennas.

After the spacecraft moved out of visibility from Santiago, its radio signal -- routinely switched to the other antenna by a previously uploaded command -- was expected to be picked up by ESA's Villafranca ground station in Spain about an hour later. Unfortunately, radio contact was never reestablished, despite the best efforts by the XMM-Newton flight control team at ESA's European Space Operations Centre (ESOC) in Darmstadt, Germany, as well as other ESA ground stations.

ESA says the situation hinted at either a technical problem on board or, in the worst case, a catastrophic event in orbit, such as a collision with space debris or a meteoroid, or a malfunction of a thruster making the spacecraft tumble wildly, or even an explosion.

Luckily, the worst cases have been ruled out as amateur astronomers in Germany's Starkenburg observatory took images of the sunlit XMM-Newton against the night sky. This showed that the satellite has not fragmented and that it is maintaining a constant attitude in its expected orbit. This was confirmed later by the many other ground-based telescopes across the globe that answered XMM-Newton's call for help.

The subsequent recovery attempt involved a more powerful ground station. ESA's 35 m-diameter antenna at New Norcia (Western Australia), using a radio-science mode developed for deep space missions, finally detected a weak signal from XMM-Newton, showing that the spacecraft is alive.

Engineers at ESOC, supported by European industry and experts from other ESA sites, are now trying to command the spacecraft in the attempt to recover a working configuration for XMM-Newton's communication system. To get the best chances of success, ESA has also requested the emergency support of NASA's Deep Space Network antennas in Canberra (Australia) and Goldstone (USA). Owing to their favorable locations when the satellite is closest to Earth, they can direct a more powerful signal to it.

Engineers hope to be able to reestablish nominal ground contact with XMM-Newton within the next few days. Until then, the spacecraft and instruments should be safe. In fact, they were prepared for perigee passage - where the instruments have to be protected from Earth's glare and the effects of Earth's radiation belts - when the anomaly occurred.

FMI: www.esa.int

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: The Switchblade Flying Car FLIES!

From 2023 (YouTube Versions): Flying Motorcycle, That Is… "First Flight was achieved under cloudy skies but calm winds. The Samson Sky team, positioned along the runway, wat>[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN! 1) I forgot my password. How do I find it? 1) Easy... click here and give us your e-mail address--we'll send it to you >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.12.24): Discrete Code

Discrete Code As used in the Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS), any one of the 4096 selectable Mode 3/A aircraft transponder codes except those ending in zero zero; >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC