Foam Didn't Concern Columbia Crew | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Jul 02, 2003

Foam Didn't Concern Columbia Crew

They Were Aware of Foam, Not of Any Danger

"Experts have reviewed the high speed photography and there is no concern for RCC or tile damage. We have seen the same phenomenon on several other flights and there is absolutely no concern for entry. That is all for now. It's a pleasure working with you every day."

That's one e-mail that Columbia's commander, Rick D. Husband, and pilot, William C. McCool (pictured) were happy to have received during the doomed shuttle's flight. It was written as part of then-private correspondence, by flight director "Steve" Stich. NASA explains that the correspondence wasn't "official."

The pilots liked it, though. Rick Husband replied two days later, again on a "personal" level, "Thanks a million, Steve! And thanks for the great work on your part."

Regardless Stich's happy note, NASA has since revealed that there was an ongoing debate on the ground, as to whether the foam collision could have precipitated a calamity.

The consensus was that, while the possibility was there, previous similar-looking contacts produced only minor damage; and certainly, the mission and the crew were not in any danger.

Later, NASA as much as said that, even if catastrophic damage had been suspected (it was not), there was little that could have been done, on that mission, to save the crew.

Later, NASA said that, had they really thought the safety of the crew were in danger, there might have been some herculean efforts that could have been employed. Some of those possible efforts are now being explored, as backups for future shuttle missions.

Columbia disintegrated February 1, 2003, on re-entry, at about 13,000 miles per hour, over Texas. All seven aboard were killed. Many e-mails, including previously-private correspondence, have been released to the site below.

FMI: www.jsc.nasa.gov/news/columbia/107_emails/foamemails.doc; www.caib.us

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC