WTO Trade Court: Who Are These Guys Anyway? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

** Airborne 11.21.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne 11.21.14 **
** Airborne 11.19.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne 11.19.14 **
** Airborne 11.17.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne 11.17.14 **

Thu, Jun 02, 2005

WTO Trade Court: Who Are These Guys Anyway?

World Trade Court Has Real Power

It's the biggest case ever to go before the World Trade Organization's court. Worth billions of dollars to both Airbus and Boeing, the subsidy dispute between the US and the EU will likely take several years and several million dollars to resolve. And the people who will decide the case probably won't even be judges -- at least, not full-time judges.

That's the way it is at the intersection of law and trade. The WTO court is staffed by freelance judges -- often diplomats -- who have very little knowledge of legal practices but are strong in their negotiating skills. For most who have sat on the WTO bench in the past, it's their first time ever settling a trade dispute.

The WTO court is chaired by a three-person panel of judges. It has real power. Just ask President George W. Bush. Two years ago, the WTO court forced him to abandon tarrifs aimed at protecting the struggling US steel industry from foreign competition. The lever in that ruling was the threat of $2 billion in trade sanctions.

Both US and EU eaders are leery of the court. "WTO panels are making up new rules," Montana Democratic Sen. Max Baucus wrote in response to questions from The Wall Street Journal. He said they "have invented rules that do not appear in any negotiated agreement -- then used those rules to strike down US laws and policies."

An EU study found the WTO panel system should be altered, saying "panelists do not have time to develop expertise in the procedural and technical aspects of the dispute settlement system."

Even the judges themselves complain, saying they can't hear cases and keep their day jobs at the same time. But that's just what they're expected to do. And if they have a hard time understanding the trade laws upon which they rule, you can imagine how difficult it is for the countries involved to interpret and implement those rulings.

FMI: www.wto.org

Advertisement

More News

Barnstorming: FAA -- The Original EPA

The Governmental Death By 1000 Cuts, Continues... Guest Editorial by Rich Davidson, Grass Cutting Administrator At Lee Bottom Flying Field/API Advisory Board Did you feel that Aero>[...]

Financier Says Heathrow Expansion Easier To Fund Than Gatwick

Ian Hannam Backs Heathrow Hub U.K. financier Ian Hannam, one of the backers of Heathrow Hub, has said that Gatwick would find it much more difficult to fund expansion than either o>[...]

AD: Boeing Company

AD NUMBER: 2014-23-04 PRODUCT: Certain The Boeing Company Model 777-200LR, -300, -300ER, and 777F series airplanes.>[...]

AD: Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AD NUMBER: 2014-23-06 PRODUCT: Certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.21.14)

Alaska Airman's Association The Alaska Airmen's Association is the largest state general aviation group in Alaska. It is a non-profit 501 (c) 3 organization whose sole purpose is t>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2014 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC