AAIB Says Thomas Cook Jet Flew Twice With Damaged Maingear | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Feb 27, 2008

AAIB Says Thomas Cook Jet Flew Twice With Damaged Maingear

Ground Crews Missed Problem After Hard Landing

An Airbus A320 operated by the Thomas Cook Group, a major European travel company, was permitted to keep flying after damaging its main gear in a hard landing at Bristol, England in November 2006, according to a recent report by the British Department of Transport's Air Accidents Investigation Branch.

Bloomberg reports the plane came through turbulence and made a hard landing at Bristol, but ground crews there didn't find the resulting damage to the right main gear. After the plane took off on its next flight, the gear failed to retract, and the flight was diverted to Manchester.

In somewhat of an eyebrow-raiser, mechanics there were not told of the original hard landing at Bristol, and failed to jack up the plane to thoroughly inspect the gear. On the plane's next takeoff, the gear got stuck down again.

"Although checks were carried out at Bristol, an opportunity to find the damage was missed," the AAIB said. "It was only after the second landing at Manchester that the damage was discovered."

The AAIB noted the design of the landing gear could mask potential damage during a cursory ground check. "The weakest point appears to be the landing gear, and in particular the upper diaphragm, the failure of which is not readily apparent when the aircraft is on the ground," the AAIB said.

Airbus might take comfort in another AAIB statement, however, that noted the whole ordeal "...demonstrates that the aircraft is able to withstand such landings without suffering major structural damage."

FMI: www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/home/index.cfm

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC