British Government Seeks Added Passenger Protection | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Airborne On ANN

Oshkosh Day One

Oshkosh Day Two

Oshkosh Day Three

Oshkosh Day Four

Oshkosh Day Five

Airborne Hi-Def On YouTube

Oshkosh Day One

Oshkosh Day Two

Oshkosh Day Three

Oshkosh Day Four

Oshkosh Day Five

Tweet Us The Coolest Things You See @OSH16!
#OSH16Coolest!

It's Alive!: AirVenture 2016 Innovation Preview on Vimeo!

It's Alive!: AirVenture 2016 Innovation Preview on YouTube!

Wed, Mar 24, 2004

British Government Seeks Added Passenger Protection

Airline Insolvency Issues Addressed

There's nothing worse than flying away from home only to later find out the airline you've booked with has suddenly gone out of business. Unfortunately, this situation has confronted many travellers, which explains why the British government is working on measures to prevent this kind of situation from arising again.

The UK's Civil Aviation Authority (AAA) is proposing to introduce greater protection for passengers booking direct with airlines. It wants individual passengers to enjoy the same protection given on bookings through tour operators. This measure is designed to cover the possibility of an airline going bust with passengers stranded overseas.

The move follows a consultation in 2003, when the CAA set out to investigate the problem where trends showed people were purchasing separate travel components, often including flights on no-frills airlines, rather than complete vacation packages. These bookings carry either limited protection against insolvency or none at all, but research showed that the public was not aware of that.

The CAA's draft advice, which is now being circulated to key parties before being submitted to the UK Government, suggests that advance payments for bookings direct with airlines should be financially protected in the same way as vacation packages. It means airline tickets booked directly may have to have an additional charge or levy to cover the costs of the scheme. The CAA's proposal would require a change in UK law.

Over the past seventeen years, Air Travel Organisers' Licensing (ATOL) has managed over 300 tour operator failures, rescuing almost 190,000 people from being stranded and giving refunds to more than a million others at a total cost of �160 million ($295 million). Since March 2003, 3,900 people were rescued or refunded, at a cost of �1.3 million.

ATOL is managed by the CAA and gives comprehensive protection from losing money or being stranded abroad to people in the UK who buy air holidays and flights from tour operators each year. It is by far the largest travel protection program in the UK, and the only one for flights and air holidays sold by tour operators. The problem is that ATOL is not set up to apply to tickets bought directly from airlines.

The CAA says changing patterns in technology and the increased availability of cheap scheduled tickets has led to the public buying their holidays in new ways. It published research indicating that there was public confusion over which travel products included insolvency protection and which did not, and put a series of questions relating to the proper scope of consumer protection and the means by which it should be provided.

All tour operators selling flights and air holidays must hold a license from the CAA. Before it gets a license each operator is examined to ensure it is properly managed and financially sound, and it must lodge a bond, which is a financial guarantee provided by a bank or insurance company. If it fails, the CAA then uses the money to pay for people abroad to continue their holidays and to travel home as planned, and to make refunds to those who have paid but not travelled. If the bond is not enough, any shortfall is met by the Air Travel Trust Fund, which is managed by the CAA and backs up the individual bonds.

There is no equivalent scheme covering sales made directly by airlines. Most passengers carried on charter airlines buy their tickets through tour operators and are protected by ATOL. Passengers carried on scheduled airlines are not protected by ATOL unless they buy the seat, perhaps as part of a package, from an ATOL holder.

FMI: www.caa.co.uk

Advertisement

More News

AutoGyro Introduces Type Certified Gyroplanes In The U.S.

Two Versions Of The Calidus Gyroplane FAA Approved The FAA has type-certified two versions of the German-built Calidus Gyroplane after the recent completion of conformity testing c>[...]

SPA Introduces Their 3.3 Liter Corvair Conversion

'Engine In Box' Option Allows Quicker Competition Times For Builders In the North Aircraft display area, Dan and Rachel Weseman of Sport Performance Aviation LLC debuted their late>[...]

Avidyne Makes Innovative Use Of IFD Series With iPads

Provide Interesting Big Glass Solutions For Both Forward Fit And Retrofit Avidyne is showcasing some innovative ‘Big Glass’ configurations in their booth at Oshkosh thi>[...]

Wipaire Helps ANN Make AirVenture Coverage Happen!

Wipaire Is A Leading Aircraft Service Provider, and the Holder Of Over 100 STCs For over 55 years, Wipaire has been engineering and manufacturing a full line of aircraft floats for>[...]

Airborne 07.26.16-Oshkosh Day 2: Solar Impulse, Sun Flyer, Stemme S-12

Also: AEA $$Giveaway$$, LAM Aviation, Able Flight, Jack Pelton On Aero-Medical Reform We start our report this morning with something that has very little to do with the EAA AirVen>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2016 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC