NTSB: Disorientation, Avionics Failure Factors In 2005 SR22 Mishap | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Sun, Jun 04, 2006

NTSB: Disorientation, Avionics Failure Factors In 2005 SR22 Mishap

Plane Had History Of PFD Issues

In its Probable Cause report on a January 2005 fatal accident in Florida involving a Cirrus SR22, the National Transportation Safety Board ruled this week that several factors -- including pilot disorientation, and an unspecified avionics failure -- contributed to the accident.

As Aero-News reported last year, pilot Gerald "Jerry" Ballard was flying his SR22 on January 15, 2005 in marginal VFR-to-IFR conditions over Coconut Creek, FL when he told ATC he was experiencing problems with the plane's avionics.

A transcript of communications between the pilot and ATC also shows Ballard had misinterpreted a series of ATC communications meant for another aircraft... and seemed confused and disoriented.

The NTSB says that shortly after Ballard reported the avionics problem, his aircraft dropped 1,500 feet in 12 seconds, and then climbed 1,000 feet in the next 12 seconds. Witnesses on the ground reported hearing the sound of an aircraft engine straining, as if it were performing aerobatic maneuvers.

The aircraft impacted a house moments after Ballard's last transmission to ATC -- "I'm losin', I'm losin' it again here."

Ballard did not tell controllers the nature of his avionics problem, and it is unclear how much of a factor it may have played in the accident.

NTSB records show the accident aircraft was on its third Primary Flight Display, with approximately 98 hours on the airframe.

Ballard's logbook showed 483 hours of flight time logged, with 405 hours between two SR22s. He had 15 hours of actual IFR time logged, with 61 hours of simulated IFR.

Ballard had logged 0.2 hours actual IFR time one week before the accident, including an instrument approach. A flight instructor interviewed by the NTSB told investigators Ballard had practiced several partial-panel approaches, without the PFD (relying on the backup instrumentation below the PFD, shown below) with no apparent difficulty.

The board ruled the primary cause of the accident was "[t]he pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control, which resulted in an uncontrolled descent to the ground." Contributing to the crash were "an avionics failure, pilot disorientation, and instrument meteorological conditions."

"A factor in the severity of the impact was the pilot's failure to deploy the airplane's onboard parachute system," the NTSB adds.

FMI: Read The Probable Cause Report

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC