FAA Releases Updated Field Approval Policy | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

AMA Drone Report

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday

Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI

Airborne On ANN

AMA 03.23.17

Airborne
03.27.17

Airborne
03.28.17

Airborne
03.29.17

Airborne
03.30.17

Airborne 03.24.17

Airborne-Unmanned 03.28.17

Airborne-YouTube

AMA 03.23.17

Airborne
03.27.17

Airborne
03.28.17

Airborne
03.29.17

Airborne
03.30.17

Airborne 03.24.17

Airborne-Unmanned 03.28.17

Sun, May 25, 2003

FAA Releases Updated Field Approval Policy

Inspectors Must Now Know Something About The Stuff They Inspect

This week the FAA issued a revised set of instructions (Change 16 to Order 8300.10) to FAA inspectors for the approval of major repairs and alterations to aircraft. These instructions replace those issued in September 2002.

Pain Relief

The revision was due to significant problems for aircraft owners and mechanics attempting to obtain approval for such changes. Some local FAA Flight Standards District Offices (FSDO) simply refused to process many of the applications for repairs and alterations and used what is commonly referred to as field approvals, or 337s. Aircraft operators in Alaska were so greatly affected that the FAA agreed to temporarily rescind the implementation of the new policy in the Alaska Region. The revised instructions clarify to FSDO inspectors what major repairs and alterations they can approve and what resources are available to assist them in making their determination.

Another issue: if the inspector was not "thoroughly familiar with all aspects of the alteration or repair" he or she could not provide the approval. This language led to the denial of several applications when the policy was first released. The revised instructions added the following statement:

"The lack of ASI qualifications does not mean the FSDO should deny a field approval and tell the applicant that they need an STC. The ASI can seek assistance from another ASI or FSDO, as appropriate."

And because some applicants do not have an in-depth knowledge of all the information needed and the manner it should be presented, the new instructions provide for that situation. They also allow applicants to make changes to the application in order to prevent denial and the need for a complete new application.

FMI: www2.faa.gov/avr/afs/faa/8300/8300_vol2/2_001_00.pdf

Advertisement

More News

Airborne-Unmanned 03.28.17: Gremlins UAS, Drone Privacy, Alpha Unmanned Helo

Also: Knifefish UUV, Runway Inspection Drones, Drone Hinders Firefighting, Canada's New Drone Regs DARPA has awarded two Phase 2 contracts of its Gremlins program to Dynetics, Inc.>[...]

G5 Electronic Flight Instrument Approved As A DG/HSI In Certificated Aircraft

Dual G5 Installation Options Support Safety-Enhancing Redundancy With Dual ADAHRS And Back-Up Battery Garmin has announced the approval of the G5 electronic flight instrument for i>[...]

Garmin TeamX Introduces New G3X Touch Display For Experimental Aircraft

Updated Device Features Seven-Inch Portrait Display Garmin has announced a new addition to the G3X Touch glass flight display family, the 7-inch G3X Touch portrait display. For fir>[...]

Airborne 03.29.17: F-16 Makes A Move, Sumwalt to NTSB, DJI Proposes Drone IDs

Also: SKYe SH09, AEA 2017 Opening/NPI, FAA Certifies Elite, Carrier Strike Group, G650 Sim, SBIRS Satellite, Hawaiian Airlines The ‘electric jet’ is moving to South Car>[...]

Airborne 03.28.17: Dynon ADS-B/WX Recvrs, B-29 'Doc' Touring!, Atlanta Tech

Also: Safety Focus, Aero-Calendar, Mechanic Pay, Alaska Airlines, GAMA, CA Aviation Hall Of Fame, Gogo Biz 4G Dynon’s new dual band SV-ADSB-472 receives ADS-B traffic via 978>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2017 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC