FAA Issues SAIB For Propeller Overspeed | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Mar 18, 2010

FAA Issues SAIB For Propeller Overspeed

Applies To Piston Engine Airplanes With Variable Pitch Props

The FAA has issued a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) to alert operators, pilots, and aircraft manufacturers of concerns for an optimum response to a propeller overspeed in piston engine aircraft with variable pitch propellers. At this time, the FAA has concluded that the airworthiness concern is not an unsafe condition that would warrant airworthiness directive (AD) action.

Recently, a single-engine aircraft experienced a propeller overspeed during cruise flight at 7,000 ft. The pilot reported that the application of throttle resulted in a propeller overspeed with no appreciable thrust. The pilot attempted to glide to a nearby airport and established the “best glide” speed of 110 knots (as published in the Pilot’s Operating Handbook). The pilot was unable to reach the airport and was forced to conduct an off field landing.

It was determined that the propeller experienced a failure that caused the blade pitch change mechanism to move to the low pitch stop position. This caused the propeller to operate as a fixed pitch propeller such that it changes RPM with changes in power and airspeed. The low pitch setting allows for maximum power during take off but can result in a propeller overspeed at a higher airspeed. A performance evaluation of the flight condition was performed for the particular aircraft model involved in this incident. This evaluation indicated that an airspeed lower than the best glide speed would have resulted in increased thrust and enabled the pilot to maintain level flight.

There are numerous variables in aircraft, engines, and propellers, which affect aircraft performance. For some aircraft models, the published best glide speed may not be low enough to generate adequate thrust for a given propeller installation in this situation (propeller blades at low pitch stop position).

The graph below shows thrust versus airspeed for a typical propeller model set at a 12-degree blade angle and maintaining 2,700 revolutions per minute (RPM). From the graph, note that at over 118 knots this propeller is incapable of generating a positive thrust and airspeed has to be lower than 95 knots to generate enough thrust to overcome the aircraft drag, i.e. maintain level flight. While different propeller models have different thrust characteristics and different aircraft have different drag characteristics, the concept remains the same – the lower the airspeed the more thrust there is available at a given RPM.

A review of pilot’s operating handbooks from several aircraft manufacturers showed they did not include emergency procedures for a propeller overspeed. In cases where overspeed procedures were published, the procedure said to simply reduce throttle. More appropriately, the procedures  should advise the pilot to control a propeller overspeed by throttle reduction and a reduction in airspeed as much as practical with an adequate margin above stall speed such that level flight can be maintained.

The FAA says that the operators of aircraft with variable pitch propellers should be aware that in certain instances of propeller overspeed, the airspeed necessary to maintain level flight may be different than the speed associated with engine-out best glide speed. The appropriate emergency procedures should be followed to mitigate the emergency situation in the event of a propeller overspeed; however, pilots should be aware that some reduction in airspeed may result in the ability for continued safe flight and landing. The determination of an airspeed that is more suitable than engine-out best glide speed should only be conducted at a safe altitude when the pilot has time to determine an alternative course of action other than landing immediately.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.16.24)

Aero Linx: International Business Aviation Council Ltd IBAC promotes the growth of business aviation, benefiting all sectors of the industry and all regions of the world. As a non->[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.16.24)

"During the annual inspection of the B-24 “Diamond Lil” this off-season, we made the determination that 'Lil' needs some new feathers. Due to weathering, the cloth-cove>[...]

Airborne 04.10.24: SnF24!, A50 Heritage Reveal, HeliCycle!, Montaer MC-01

Also: Bushcat Woes, Hummingbird 300 SL 4-Seat Heli Kit, Carbon Cub UL The newest Junkers is a faithful recreation that mates a 7-cylinder Verner radial engine to the airframe offer>[...]

Airborne 04.12.24: SnF24!, G100UL Is Here, Holy Micro, Plane Tags

Also: Seaplane Pilots Association, Rotax 916’s First Year, Gene Conrad After a decade and a half of struggling with the FAA and other aero-politics, G100UL is in production a>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 04.17.24: Feds Need Controllers, Spirit Delay, Redbird

Also: Martha King Scholarship, Montaer Grows, Textron Updates Pistons, FlySto The FAA is hiring thousands of air traffic controllers, but the window to apply will only be open for >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC