NTSB: No New Probe Into What Brought AAL 587 Down | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, May 24, 2006

NTSB: No New Probe Into What Brought AAL 587 Down

Board Maintains Recent Incidents Not Related To 2001 Accident

No. Plain and simple. That's the answer from the NTSB to pilots who've requested the safety board take a second look at the crash of American Airlines Flight 587 in Queens, NY almost five years ago.

As Aero-News has reported, pilots are concerned about the Airbus A300-600's tail section, after two recent incidents involving the rudders of similar aircraft. Flight 587 lost its entire vertical stabilizer in wake turbulence as the aircraft flew behind a Boeing 747 as it was crossing over Belle Harbor on its way to the Dominican Republic.

The safety board ruled in that accident that the copilot's violent use of the rudder to shake the plane out of the wake turbulence caused so much stress on the tail of the plane that the stabilizer simply snapped off. It was later found in Jamaica Bay.

The pilots' request was forwarded to the NTSB by New York Democratic Congressman Anthony Weiner. It came after a Canadian Air Transat Airbus A310 all but lost its rudder on a flight from Cuba. It landed safely back at its starting point. That was in March of last year.

Back in November, a FedEx plane also suffered rudder damage... further raising pilots' concerns.

But the NTSB says the incidents were different enough from the AAL 587 crash that no further investigation is warranted.

"The data provides that there are very distinct differences between the Flight 587 accident and these two other events," the NTSB letter to Weiner said, according to the New York Daily News. "Please be assured that the Safety Board will thoroughly examine any issue or new information that might be pertinent to an investigation."

Weiner's office is reviewing the NTSB letter to see if any more action is warranted.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC