By Mark Conner, Chief Pilot, Dycom Industries, Inc.
Most corporate operators see this as
a winning move for the airlines and a financial burden to us. True
that the airlines will save money by cruising at more efficient
altitudes but the cost to my corporation is significant with little
reward.
The cost to conform our late model LearJet 35A was over $180,000 in
direct cost. If one includes the cost of nearly a month of downtime
for the modification, that number might easily be doubled. We
will see little if any reward as our cruise is usually above
RVSM altitudes. Moreover, the FAA placed a huge burden on part 91
operators to submit a manual covering operations and maintenance
procedures. This should have been covered by the SCT's continued
airworthiness instructions and a new FAR 91 regulation covering
RVSM operations. This time and expense to small flight department
is not insignificant.
Many turboprop operators have chosen
not to spend the money to modify their aircraft. They will now be
forced to operate at inefficient altitudes. Moreover, the weather
they used to top will now force either a circumnavigation or a
cancellation of the flight. This hurts general aviation as it makes
planes more expensive to own, or operate and reduces the utility of
a huge number of planes.
Many operators of older jets have found conformity to RVSM cost
prohibitive. There is a whole generation of older LearJets,
Citations, Hawkers, and Saberliners that will be doomed. Their
values have steadily dropped and operating costs have risen due to
high fuel flows. For example, older Lear 24 can be had for little
more than the price of a good Navajo with an operating cost over
$1500 per hour. This made them ideal for owners who operated
infrequently and were willing to foot the bill for fuel as long as
they didn't have to face a multimillion-dollar debt service. These
planes are destined to be sold to third world countries for little
more than their salvage values.
RVSM has not been a friend to General Aviation. It is yet
another move toward the restrictive type of airspace that plagues
Europe. I cannot help but ask how long until the rest of General
Aviation is as restricted and costly as it is now in Europe. How
long before legislators, in the name of national security and
airline profitability, add the next level of bricks on the tomb of
General Aviation?
Aero Linx: International Flying Farmers IFF is a not-for-profit organization started in 1944 by farmers who were also private pilots. We have members all across the United States a>[...]
From 2017 (YouTube Version): Remembrances Of An Israeli Air Force Test Pilot Early in 2016, ANN contributor Maxine Scheer traveled to Israel, where she had the opportunity to sit d>[...]
"We renegotiated what our debt restructuring is on a lot of our debts, mostly with the family. Those debts are going to be converted into equity..." Source: Excerpts from a short v>[...]
Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]
Chart Supplement US A flight information publication designed for use with appropriate IFR or VFR charts which contains data on all airports, seaplane bases, and heliports open to >[...]