NASA Moves Atlantis Launch To Sunday | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Sat, Dec 08, 2007

NASA Moves Atlantis Launch To Sunday

Engineers Continue Work On ECO Sensor Glitch

Will NASA launch the shuttle Atlantis "as is," with two out of four sensors in the external fuel tank malfunctioning? That's one option NASA is reportedly considering, in its desire to launch the orbiter towards the International Space Station before an eight-day launch window expires.

As ANN reported, NASA scrubbed Thursday's launch attempt due to malfunctions in two engine cut-off (ECO) fuel level sensors within the enormous fuel tank. The sensors are meant to safeguard the orbiter's three main engines, by cutting power if lower-than-expected fuel levels are detected during the launch phase.

The agency also opted to forego a Friday launch, so it could continue work on the issue. Late Friday night, NASA announced it would move the launch off yet another day, to Sunday.

NASA's standard protocols require at least three ECO sensors be functioning for launch... but the agency adds it's possible to launch the shuttle with only two operational sensors, although that's not the preferred option.

CBS News reports if a third sensor were to fail during launch, the last remaining sensor would trigger a premature engine shutdown. In fact, that's what it is designed to do -- so the engines remain protected in case the fourth sensor were to fail.

In that scenario, depending on what phase of the ascent such a failure occurred, the shuttle would abort directly to a landing site, or abort to orbit and then return to Earth following a subsequent trip around the planet.

A catastrophic failure could occur if the shuttle's main engines remained powered up as the tank ran dry, according to NASA.

Due to the tight eight-day launch window for STS-122, NASA doesn't have enough time to replace the errant sensors... meaning engineers must either develop a work-around solution, or sign off on launching with only two functional ECO sensors.

NASA engineers and mission personnel met Friday to discuss possible options. At the end of the six-hour meeting, mission managers determined it was too late to push for a Saturday launch.

Stay tuned...

FMI: www.spaceflight.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

SpaceX to Launch Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle in Fall

Inversion to Launch Reentry Vehicle Demonstrator Aboard SpaceX Falcon 9 This fall, the aerospace startup Inversion is set to launch its Ray reentry demonstrator capsule aboard Spac>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.23.24)

"We are excited to accelerate the adoption of electric aviation technology and further our journey towards a sustainable future. The agreement with magniX underscores our commitmen>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.20.24)

Aero Linx: OX5 Aviation Pioneers Each year a national reunion of OX5 Aviation Pioneers is hosted by one of the Wings in the organization. The reunions attract much attention as man>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC