NTSB Recommends Inclusion Of Bounced Landing Recovery Techniques | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Sep 08, 2005

NTSB Recommends Inclusion Of Bounced Landing Recovery Techniques

Should Be Included In Manuals Following 2004 Executive Airlines Accident

The NTSB has determined that the probable cause of the May 9, 2004 accident involving Executive Airlines, that crashed while landing at Luis Munoz Marin International Airport San Juan, Puerto Rico, was the captain's failure to execute proper techniques to recover from bounced landings and his subsequent failure to execute a go-around.

As a result of the accident, the Safety Board recommended that the Federal Aviation Administration require all airlines to incorporate bounced landing recovery techniques in their flight manuals and teach these techniques during initial and recurrent training.

On May 9, 2004, Executive Airlines, flight 5401, was doing business as an American Eagle flight from Mayaguez, Puerto Rico to San Juan, Puerto Rico. During the landing, the airplane bounced twice before coming to a complete stop on a grassy area about 217 feet from the runway 's centerline and about 4,317 feet beyond the runway. The captain was seriously injured.

The first officer, 2 flight attendants, and 16 of the 22 passengers received minor injuries. Damage to the aircraft was substantial.

During its investigation, the Safety Board also learned that the left aileron surface position data recorded by the accident airplane's flight data recorder was invalid even though the aircraft was modified on August 7, 2001 with position sensors and associated hardware required by a supplemental type certificate (STC).

The Safety Board issued two recommendations to the FAA that would require replacement of aileron sensors installed in accordance with the STC (ST01310NY) and call for a review of all FDR systems that have been modified by a STC to ensure that the sensors provide reliable data.

A synopsis of the report, including a complete list of the Conclusions and Recommendations, can be found on the Board's website.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.15.24)

Aero Linx: International Flying Farmers IFF is a not-for-profit organization started in 1944 by farmers who were also private pilots. We have members all across the United States a>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: 'No Other Options' -- The Israeli Air Force's Danny Shapira

From 2017 (YouTube Version): Remembrances Of An Israeli Air Force Test Pilot Early in 2016, ANN contributor Maxine Scheer traveled to Israel, where she had the opportunity to sit d>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.15.24)

"We renegotiated what our debt restructuring is on a lot of our debts, mostly with the family. Those debts are going to be converted into equity..." Source: Excerpts from a short v>[...]

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.16.24): Chart Supplement US

Chart Supplement US A flight information publication designed for use with appropriate IFR or VFR charts which contains data on all airports, seaplane bases, and heliports open to >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC