Consumer Group Says DOT Data Shows That 3 Hour Rule Works For Passengers | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Aug 18, 2010

Consumer Group Says DOT Data Shows That 3 Hour Rule Works For Passengers

Report Shows Only 3 Airplanes On The Tarmac Over Three Hours In June

FlyersRights.org says that the latest official DOT data refutes claims by airlines that the 3 Hour Rule is causing cancellations and not helping passengers. According to the most recent report, last year in June there were 268 tarmac delays of over 3 hours. This year in June there were 3. Additionally, the number of flights cancelled by airlines held steady. The rate was 1.5% this year in June and 1.5% last year in June. Airline officials had warned that they might cancel flights which were in danger of being delayed more than three hours to avoid hefty fines.

"Despite claims and threats by the airlines that the new rules, including the 3 Hour Rule, would spark mass cancellations and apocalyptic upheaval for passengers, just the opposite has taken place--tarmac strandings are way down and the number of cancellations has not changed," said Kate Hanni, Founder and Executive Director of FlyersRights.org, in a statement Monday. "We are very encouraged that these important protections are working as intended and that the airlines' claims to the contrary can be added to the long list of falsehoods they have tried to sell the public over the years."

"Though they are still engaged in a massive effort to subvert the rule and the facts of its implementation, the real data does not lie," Hanni continued. "Though many airlines have fought this rule tooth and nail and continue to do so, they are to be congratulated on improving conditions for passengers and following the law."

FMI: www.bts.gov/press_releases/2010/dot156_10/html/dot156_10.html

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC