FAA's Babbitt Presses For Changes At LAX | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Apr 08, 2010

FAA's Babbitt Presses For Changes At LAX

Takes Issue With NASA Report On Safety At The Airport

In a letter to Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and LAX airport officials, FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt says it would be a "serious mistake" to not reconfigure the north portion of the airfield. The letter was in response to a study released by NASA's Ames Research Center which said any increase in safety realized by increasing the separation between the runways at the LAX north airfield would be "inconsequential."

"The status quo is not good enough for the FAA, and the city of Los Angeles should not view it as good enough for the traveling public," Babbitt wrote.

In its report, NASA officials and an academic panel said that the current configuration of the runways would lead to one death from a runway collision for every 150 million airline passengers ... or about five deaths over the next 10 years.

The Daily Breeze of Torrance, CA reports that Mayor Villaraigosa, who has been opposed to the reconfiguration, admitted that Babbitt had made some valid points, and said they would be studied as part of a review of the airport's master plan. That plan recommends separating the northern runways.

The runways are separated by only 700 feet, and the FAA has recorded 46 runway incursion at the north airfield since 1998. For instance, on March 16 of this year, a 747 failed to completely clear the runway after landing while another flight landed behind it. The FAA contends that the landing space is tight, particularly for such airplanes as the A380 and the Dreamliner. "(T)he March 16 incursion underscored the difficulty of operating large aircraft on the cramped north airfield," Babbitt wrote.

Separating the north airfield runways would be similar to a $333 million project at the south end of the airport completed two years ago.

FMI: www.faa.gov, www.lawa.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.14.24)

Aero Linx: Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) The Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) is the Training and Safety arm of the Soaring Society of America (SSA). Our mission is to provide ins>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: 'We're Surviving'-- Kyle Franklin Describes Airshow Life 2013

From 2013 (YouTube Version): Dracula Lives On Through Kyle Franklin... and We're NOT Scared! ANN CEO and Editor-in-Chief, Jim Campbell speaks with Aerobatic and airshow master, Kyl>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC