Opposition to Jetport West Gets Teeth | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Sat, Jul 31, 2004

Opposition to Jetport West Gets Teeth

ATC Expert Backs Opponents To Texas Airport

The Jetport West Airport project proposed for the city of Fulshear (TX) "presents an irreconcilable conflict with several local airports, making it fundamentally unsafe and a hazard to navigable airspace."

So says an aviation consultant hired by the town, in an affidavit filed with the FAA Tuesday. Donald Hensley, a former controller and commercial pilot, believes building an airport when there are already six inside a five-mile radius will cause insurmountable problems throughout the area.

But Rick Asper, who speaks for Florida-based Aviation Professionals Group, says the airport his company wants to build won't cause any problems at all.

"It should be noted that there are literally hundreds of airports that are far closer to equivalent airstrips than these are, and that these airports and airstrips have coexisted for decades without incident," Asper said in an interview with the Katy (TX) Times.

Hensley, however, says there are already enough potential problems in that small area. Quoting FAA rules, he writes in the affidavit, "The traffic pattern airspace associated with an airport proposal may not overlap the traffic pattern of an adjacent airport."

But Asper says the FAA has already made an exception in that area. "Two of the airstrips to which they refer overlap each other, and in some people's definition of air traffic, have coexisted for 30 years without incident," Asper said.

The proximity of the proposed jetport to five other strips isn't Hensley's only concern. He says there are at least two obstructions just south of the 525-acre site pose a "hazard to air navigation."

Again, however, Asper says his company is addressing those obstructions -- and other concerns about the 7,000-foot jetport runway. "We are proposing a control tower. We will at our expense, fully man and operate a control tower. This is actually an increase in airspace safety."

FMI: www.aviation-professionals.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.15.24)

Aero Linx: International Flying Farmers IFF is a not-for-profit organization started in 1944 by farmers who were also private pilots. We have members all across the United States a>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: 'No Other Options' -- The Israeli Air Force's Danny Shapira

From 2017 (YouTube Version): Remembrances Of An Israeli Air Force Test Pilot Early in 2016, ANN contributor Maxine Scheer traveled to Israel, where she had the opportunity to sit d>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.15.24)

"We renegotiated what our debt restructuring is on a lot of our debts, mostly with the family. Those debts are going to be converted into equity..." Source: Excerpts from a short v>[...]

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.16.24): Chart Supplement US

Chart Supplement US A flight information publication designed for use with appropriate IFR or VFR charts which contains data on all airports, seaplane bases, and heliports open to >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC