$2 Million Settlement Reached In Cory Lidle Suit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Oct 07, 2009

$2 Million Settlement Reached In Cory Lidle Suit

Estates Had "No Other Assets Worth Pursuing"

Plaintiffs who suffered losses when a Cirrus SR-20 crashed into a high-rise apartment building in Manhattan on October 11th, 2006 have dropped a $60 million lawsuit, and have agreed to settle for $2 million, according to the mediator in the case.

The NTSB was unable to determine whether Cory Lidle (pictured, right), a pitcher for the New York Yankees, or his flight instructor, 26-year-old Tyler Stanger, was at the controls of the aircraft when it attempted a 180 degree turn in tight quarters and impacted the building. Several pedestrians were injured when debris fell from the crash site, and there were millions of dollars in property damage to the building.

The online site Law.com reports that the plaintiffs dropped the suit because both Lidle and Stanger carried $1 million in life insurance, and their estates had "no other assets worth pursuing" in the case. One personal injury claimant did not accept the settlement.

Lidle was a licensed pilot. The NTSB determined the cause of the accident to be "the pilots' inadequate planning, judgment and airmanship in trying to make a 180-degree turn led to the crash," but never determined precisely who was pilot-in-command.

Cirrus SR-20 File Photo

Law.com reports that the $2 million will be split between insurance companies that claim to have paid out $16.5 million for damages to the building and personal injury.

A product liability suit has been filed against Cirrus by Lidle's widow and Stanger's estate, despite NTSB data that tends to indicate that the airframe was not a significant factor in the cause of this tragic accident.

FMI: www.cirrusaircraft.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.21.24)

Aero Linx: JAARS, Inc. For decades now, we’ve landed planes on narrow rivers and towering mountains. We’ve outfitted boats and vehicles to reach villages that rarely se>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC