Navy Says Signal Interference With Qantas Flight 'Highly Unlikely' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Nov 17, 2008

Navy Says Signal Interference With Qantas Flight 'Highly Unlikely'

Authorities To Investigate Transmissions From Sub Base

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau said on Friday that it intends to investigate the possibility that communications signals, originating from Harold E. Holt Naval Communications Base in Western Australia, may have caused interference with flight control systems aboard a Qantas airliner last month.

Calling the idea "highly unlikely," Base Manager Russell Levien said that if signals from the Base were to blame, planes would regularly be affected by them. "We'd have planes down all around us if it was us (who caused the problem)," he said.

The incident occurred about 100 miles from Holt Naval Base, which uses very low frequency signals to communicate with US and Australian submarines in the area, The Weekend Australian said.

After reviewing transmissions on the day of the incident, Levien said he did not find anything unusual. He also checked with similar naval communication bases around the world -- including a US Naval Station at Cutler, ME -- none of which had received any reports of their transmissions interfering with aircraft.

As ANN reported, the Qantas flight was enroute from Singapore to Perth on October 7 when pilots received alarms about "some irregularity with the aircraft's elevator control system", before a 300-foot uncommanded ascent followed by an abrupt 350-foot nosedive occurred, injuring numerous passengers and crew.

Latest reports list 70 people were injured in the incident, 14 of them seriously. Initially blamed on clear air turbulence, a later theory speculated in-flight use of a lap-top computer may have interfered with the plane's flight control systems.

Further research into the cause of the incident is expected to be conducted this week at Northrop Grumman's US facilities, as experts test a component possibly at fault for sending errant signals to the plane's flight control computers.

FMI: www.qantas.com, www.atsb.gov.au

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC