Thu, May 15, 2003
It's Not News
South Dakota's governor, Mike Rounds, said there won't be any
decision on whether to get rid of the state's 1988 King Air B200,
at least until auditors examinie its costs and compare them to a
likely replacement, one without propellers.
Sources near the study say that, while a jet (they
turned down a Citation II in 1994, when replacing the MU-2 in which
the former governor, George Mickelson and seven others were
killed) would cost more to buy, maintain, and operate, it has a
higher resale value.
The downside to a jet, some say, would be public perception:
some would probably protest the higher initial cost, operating
expenses, and maintenance; and overlook the resale value.
There are any number of jet people who would argue that a jet,
faster point-to-point, also can cost less overall, if used
primarily on long trips.
That, of course, brings up the question of whether the Governor
should maybe have two airplanes...
First Flight 'Exceeds Expectations' It's been a long time since we could announce the first flight of a new production aircraft... but we'll take whatever progress we can find... a>[...]
Also: Hadfield Retires, Dornier Do 17, Chinook Contract, Boeing Forecast, Wright Memorial We can't say that this was unexpected but EAA has confirmed that it has entered, reluctant>[...]
Avidyne User Community Increasingly Vocal About Legal Concerns Over Warranty Indemnifications It was presented as a bargain to certain Avidyne avionics product owners who wanted to>[...]
"The aviation community can expect much more of the same... and while many events will be able to 'punt' and do what they need to do without the 'assistance' of the FAA; those even>[...]
Another Sign Of The Times Casts Dark Shadow Over GA If there was ever any question as to who worked for who in terms of the FAA v The Aviation World, that time seems to have come a>[...]