Thu, May 15, 2003
It's Not News
South Dakota's governor, Mike Rounds, said there won't be any
decision on whether to get rid of the state's 1988 King Air B200,
at least until auditors examinie its costs and compare them to a
likely replacement, one without propellers.
Sources near the study say that, while a jet (they
turned down a Citation II in 1994, when replacing the MU-2 in which
the former governor, George Mickelson and seven others were
killed) would cost more to buy, maintain, and operate, it has a
higher resale value.
The downside to a jet, some say, would be public perception:
some would probably protest the higher initial cost, operating
expenses, and maintenance; and overlook the resale value.
There are any number of jet people who would argue that a jet,
faster point-to-point, also can cost less overall, if used
primarily on long trips.
That, of course, brings up the question of whether the Governor
should maybe have two airplanes...
Safety Or Retribution? The Supreme Court Will Decide The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on December 9, 2013 in the case Wisconsin Airlines Corporation v Hoeper. The ca>[...]
I Thought This Should Be Seen... And Said Thought/Opinions/Commentary by Jim Campbell, ANN CEO/Editor-In-Chief Nearly two months ago, ANN covered the fact that the Department of De>[...]
"The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on December 9, 2013 in the case Wisconsin Airlines Corporation v Hoeper. The case will have great significance to the flying public>[...]
Will Install Ku-Satellite Technology For International Service The FAA has granted an STC to inflight wireless company Gogo for the installation of its Ku-satellite technology on B>[...]
"(The) successful launch of the NROL-39 mission is a testament to the tremendous government-industry partnership. We greatly appreciate the teamwork with the NRO Office of Space La>[...]