DHS Eyes Missile Defense For Airlines | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Nov 13, 2003

DHS Eyes Missile Defense For Airlines

But It'll Take More Than Two Years To Get 'Em On Board

 
By this time next month, we should have some idea of who the government will tap to build an anti-missile system for the seven-thousand aircraft commercial US fleet. But it will be years before we see any fruit from this labor.
 
The Department of Homeland Security says it will award preliminary contracts to one or more of the following:
  • Northrop Grumman
  • Raytheon and Elta Systems Ltd., a unit of state-controlled Israel Aircraft Industries
  • Alliant Techsystems
  • and the U.S. unit of Britain's BAE Systems
 
The winner(s) will work on adapting existing anti-missile defense systems now used on military aircraft for civilian use.  After that, the government will give contractors 18 months to develop prototypes. Over the next two years, Uncle Sam will spend $100 million on these efforts.
 
That kind of money -- $100 million -- doesn't sound like much at the outset. But consider it an investment. Elta says it's already equipping two Israeli jetliners with its proprietary system at a cost of more than $1 million per aircraft. The carriers themselves will foot the bill beyond the first two installations. Bring the concept to America and do the math: $1 million each for 7,000 aircraft.
 
Yikes. That's a lot of dough.
It's even more if you consider that military-style missile defense system have to be replaced about once every 100 flight hours. That means more mechanics and other associated costs -- you're talking upwards of $15 billion a year, according to one estimate. Think about saddling the commercial aviation industry -- already struggling in the wake of September 11th -- with that kind of cost. It might be a good idea to start investing in Amtrak about now...
FMI: www.dhs.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC