FAA Defuses 'Tower Safety' Rhetoric | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Sep 05, 2003

FAA Defuses 'Tower Safety' Rhetoric

FAA Statement (Attributable to Administrator Marion C. Blakey) Regarding DOT Inspector General's Report on Contract Tower Safety and Operational Costs:

The Inspector General’s recent report confirms the contract tower program continues to serve the flying public safely and efficiently as it has for more than two decades. 

The report’s findings make it clear that safety is not an issue. In fact, contract towers have a significantly better safety record than comparable FAA towers. Contract towers also cost significantly less than federally-staffed ones and provide substantial savings to taxpayers -— $173 million to be exact, according to the IG’s report. 

The report refutes most of the rhetoric and reveals recent charges regarding the contract tower program to be wholly without merit. The FAA believes it is highly irresponsible to jeopardize legislation that provides critical funding for our entire aviation system, in an attempt to add thousands of new employees to the federal payroll.

Note: The next day [Friday], that statement was corrected to read:

The Inspector General’s new report, requested by the National Air Traffic Controllers Association, confirms the contract tower program continues to serve the flying public safely and efficiently as it has for more than two decades. 

The report’s findings make it clear that contract towers have a very strong safety record. At the same time, they also cost significantly less than federally staffed towers and provide substantial savings to taxpayers—$173 million to be exact, according to the IG’s report. 

The report proves that recent charges regarding the contract tower program are wholly without merit. The FAA believes it is highly irresponsible to jeopardize legislation that provides critical funding for our entire aviation system in an attempt to add thousands of new employees to the federal payroll.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.21.24)

Aero Linx: JAARS, Inc. For decades now, we’ve landed planes on narrow rivers and towering mountains. We’ve outfitted boats and vehicles to reach villages that rarely se>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC