Safety Problem With Bombardier's Challengers? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Feb 07, 2005

Safety Problem With Bombardier's Challengers?

Report: Last Week's Teterboro Mishap Was Second In 14 Months

General media outlets focused over the weekend over questions about the Bombardier Challenger series of aircraft, in the wake of Wednesday's roll-off-the-runway accident at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey.

"Everyone is doing the same thing. They are asking is there a problem and what are the facts," SentientJet CEO Steve Hankin told the North Jersey Herald.

Let's examine the facts.

Wednesday's accident at Teterboro was the second involving a Bombardier Challenger series aircraft in 14 months. In both cases, the aircraft ran off the end of the runway -- opposite ends of the same runway. Neither case involved a fatality.

There are now 64 early model Challengers still in the air over the US. In the quarter-century since the aircraft went into service, the Herald reports finding a total of nine NTSB investigations involving Challengers. In seven of those nine, human errors were determined to be either primary or secondary factors.

A Challenger went down during the CL-600 test program killing the pilot.

Two people were killed when a CL-600 crashed into the side of a Canadian mountain. In that accident, investigators found the pilot may have suffered heart problems just before impact and, in any case, tried a visual approach when instrument meteorological conditions existed over the runway.

Bombardier continues to stand by its plane. The CL-600 series "has a well-earned reputation in the industry as a very reliable, very safe aircraft," spokesman Leo Knaapen told The Sunday Record of Bergen County.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov, www.aerospace.bombardier.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC