FAA Says Construction Caused Hazards At O'Hare | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, May 16, 2007

FAA Says Construction Caused Hazards At O'Hare

Agency Won't Fine City Or Contractors

Federal Aviation Administration inspectors have found numerous violations by the Chicago Department of Aviation, the O'Hare Modernization Program and several contractors working on an expansion of O'Hare International Airport.

FAA documents obtained by the Chicago Tribune under the Freedom of Information Act revealed many potentially hazardous errors that occurred between June and October 2006 -- including construction equipment blocking runway safety areas and severed power cables that knocked out navigation aids.

In one incident, work crews either cut or crushed a utility line that powered the wind shear warning system between Runways 9 Left and 9 Right, leaving it on back-up batteries. When FAA technicians arrived to fix the problem, they found lights intended to warn pilots of a 150-foot obstruction were also inoperable.

Other violations ranged from construction crews failing to ensure that mud and dirt were promptly removed from aircraft taxiways to incidents where construction equipment and material were stored in safety zones at the ends of runways, according to the Tribune.

"What occurred is unacceptable and it is not going to be tolerated," said Rosemarie Andolino, executive director of O'Hare's $15 billion expansion project.

Ground radar and runway lighting systems were compromised when cables were destroyed by construction equipment, the FAA said.

Most worrisome is the fact these were not isolated incidents. O'Hare contractors accidentally cut power cables, resulting in equipment failures for navigation, weather, communications and safety-related systems twice on June 19 -- and again on June 23, July 10... and October 4, 13 and 27, 2006, according to FAA records.

The FAA, which fined neither the city nor its contractors, said there was no immediate threat to passenger safety in any of the incidents. After a June 23, 2006, construction inspection, the FAA did issue a stern letter of warning to Chicago Aviation Commissioner Nuria Fernandez, however.

The letter listed 17 violations and said the city Aviation Department "does not have sufficient and qualified personnel" to satisfy FAA requirements, and the city "is not equipping personnel with sufficient resources" to comply with all regulations.

The mistakes have prompted an increase in inspections and daily communication between local and federal authorities in an attempt to safeguard against future problems as work intensifies on the massive project.

"The feeling is that the city is definitely working to correct the situation," said FAA spokeswoman Elizabeth Isham Cory. "But we are watching very closely to maintain safety on the airfield."

Fernandez notes the violations occurred during the first year of major construction on the runway expansion project.

"This is the largest airport construction project in the world, also happening at the world's second-busiest airport. Things are prone to happen, but I was very confident we could deal with them, and we did," Fernandez said.

But the FAA documents show that city officials were sometimes slow to address problems and participate in safety meetings called by the FAA.

A memo dated July 19 from Tricia Halpin, an FAA airports certification safety inspector, to O'Hare Chief Operating Officer David Ochal complained no one from O'Hare's operations staff attended a specific meeting to address safety issues during the various stages of construction during the project.

"Several issues that have operational impact [were] discussed, however, Operations was not present," Halpin wrote. "We believe it is critical that Operations attends these meetings."

This was actually the second reprimand from Halpin to Aviation Department operations staff.

"I am sure you understand that a project of this magnitude requires commitment, cooperation and communication between all parties," Halpin wrote.

FMI: www.ohare.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.14.24)

Aero Linx: Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) The Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) is the Training and Safety arm of the Soaring Society of America (SSA). Our mission is to provide ins>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: 'We're Surviving'-- Kyle Franklin Describes Airshow Life 2013

From 2013 (YouTube Version): Dracula Lives On Through Kyle Franklin... and We're NOT Scared! ANN CEO and Editor-in-Chief, Jim Campbell speaks with Aerobatic and airshow master, Kyl>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC