Airplane Noise Committee Says FAA Should Alter New KSFO Flight Paths | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Dec 01, 2016

Airplane Noise Committee Says FAA Should Alter New KSFO Flight Paths

Recommends Higher Approach Altitudes And Procedural Changes

After four months of work, the Select Committee on South Bay Arrivals has recommended some changes to the new approach corridors over Palo Alto, Mountain View, Menlo Park, East Palo Alto, and other communities south of San Francisco International Airport (KSFO).

The Palo Alto Weekly newspaper reports that the committee produced a 44-page report that includes ideas ranging from a change in nighttime flight hours to changing routes aircraft use on approach to the airport.

The flight paths became an issue when after the FAA implemented NextGen approach procedures into KSFO in 2015 which took aircraft over communities that had not previously seen a lot of air traffic. The most controversial route shifted a flight path three miles to the east, and was intended for Optimal Profile Descent under NextGen. But there was a conflict with other restricted airspace around KSFO, and pilots were required to carry power and then use "speed braking" to reduce airspeed on approach, which created more noise. The route, known as SERFR, generated more than a million complaints, according to the committee's report.

The committee recommended returning that route to the previous Big Sur flight path. However, that recommendation was opposed by members of the committee who live in the towns underneath that flight path. It also recommended that the FAA establish a minimum altitude over the MENLO waypoint of 5,000 feet.

The committee went on to recommend that the FAA should continue to meet with the community leaders after new procedures are implemented to track how effective the changes have been, and should consider developing a new flight path that would take flights over less populated areas.

FMI: Full Report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.14.24)

Aero Linx: Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) The Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) is the Training and Safety arm of the Soaring Society of America (SSA). Our mission is to provide ins>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: 'We're Surviving'-- Kyle Franklin Describes Airshow Life 2013

From 2013 (YouTube Version): Dracula Lives On Through Kyle Franklin... and We're NOT Scared! ANN CEO and Editor-in-Chief, Jim Campbell speaks with Aerobatic and airshow master, Kyl>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC