Exercises In Aero-Futility -- UARC To Fly 'Straight and Level Demonstration' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Aug 19, 2011

Exercises In Aero-Futility -- UARC To Fly 'Straight and Level Demonstration'

Kinda Like Watching Paint Dry, The Average GA Arrival Should Be A LOT More Exciting Than UARC's 'Performance' at KCMA

OK... I've said it before and I pray that I don't have to say it again... but this story could NOT get more bizarre. In a last ditch attempt to fly 'something... anything...' in order for the Camarillo Airshow to preserve the appearance of the act once espoused by the so-called Unlimited Air Race Challenge, the FAA has agreed to let the 'team' fly an exceedingly simple program at this weekend's event.

UARC's 'Performances' Will Be Greatly Simplifed...

How simple? How about a few passes well away from the spectators, straight and level, with no aerobatics and no aggressive maneuvering... kinda like the flying everyone will see from any private (or even student) pilot flying into the airport to watch the event.

As previously noted...

  • An aggressive racing program once described as "Mixed Martial Arts In The Air" was claimed to have been approved by the FAA long ago -- it never was.
     
  • It was supposed to have been crewed by seven of the best pilots in the world -- it isn't and they aren't.
     
  • The team was said to have trained and practiced for months on end and qualified to rigorous standards -- well, they didn't.
     
  • And when the FAA publicly denied any approvals for the team, they ignored reality and told media representatives, far and wide, that the race was on, gave television and newspaper interviews to that effect and made dozens of claims with little basis in reality. Oooppsss...
     
  • And finally, the airshow organization and the airport authority for Camarillo Airport's airshow was warned multiple times by a great number of persons of the many hazards, falsehoods and concerns inherent in the wild claims of the UARC program. Regardless, they promoted the organization despite knowing full well that the site, team, aircraft, pilots and racing program not was not approved by the FAA... but had been turned down in no uncertain terms...
     
  • And, as of this moment, Wings Over Camarillo and the UARC organization (via their web sites and marketing) continue to claim that they will have an air race this weekend... But, NO, they won't.
     
  • In the meantime; the FAA has made it clear that there will be no such thing.

BUT... there will be a limited formation flight, followed by individual non-formation flights by the UARC 'pilots' that will fulfill a fraction (1/100th???) of the many promises made and seemingly broken by the organizers and staff of this unapproved, disorganized, and blatantly deceptive air racing fiasco.

According to FAA officials, the UARC flyers will be allowed the following at this weekend's Wings Over Camarillo airshow:

  • The UARC pilots can do a flyby in formation at 500 feet followed by single-file passes at 200 feet.
  • The pylons will be inflated, but the pilots will fly 140 feet above them and 250 feet away from them laterally.
  • They will not fly through the pylons as they originally wanted to do.
  • The UARC pilots will fly the same path that all other air show performers fly, and will be subject to the same restrictions that apply to the other performers.
  • This means that, among other things, they'll fly with their wings level and not perform any aerobatic maneuvers.
  • Wings Over Camarillo documented in writing what the flights will entail, including the flight path and altitudes.

And with luck, they'll do just that and not give into the temptation to show off or violate their agreements... and thereby endanger untold numbers of people in the process.

The FAA thought long and hard about this, and while their exposure to the UARC organization was less than impressive while they had to deal with an extensive amount of misinformation and a ponderous lack of preparation, the Feds have promised that they will watch these proceedings VERY carefully. "We'll have multiple FAA inspectors at the air show this weekend to ensure that public safety will be protected at all times. They will pre-brief all airshow participants on what they can and cannot do, and they will carefully observe all participants during the course of the air show," notes FAA PAO Ian Gregor.

That was the carrot, this is the stick... Gregor stated that, "If any participant violates the terms of the air show waiver, we can cancel the waiver and the entire show will have to stop."

In other words, if UARC screws up, the show comes to a screeching halt.  

ANN did learn that UARC's controversial promoter, David Riggs, applied on his own to fly through the pylons. The FAA reports that they, "denied that application."

While there is little point to the current UARC plans for the Wings Over Camarillo airshow, questions are arising, with great rapidity and urgency over why WOC didn't check the preparation, plans, background and qualifications of the UARC crew. Attempts to ask about UARC and some of the more worrisome details of the event (especially things like David Riggs's FAA violations, the buzzing of the Santa Monica Pier in 2008, and his multiple criminal convictions) not only fell on deaf ears, but when WOC honcho Jon Whited was directly questioned by ANN and other parties, the reception was defensive, if not hostile. According to an email forwarded to ANN, Whited responded to one blogger's questions (and stories) about her concerns over the hazards of this event by going on the attack, "You took a very irresponsible position for the purpose of bringing damage to someone who has done nothing but help us with our air show. I hope he sues you. Your actions caused our air show, the youth we support, and a corporation damage."

That acerbic reply is questionable, in that legitimate questions about the safety of the event were rooted in the UARC organization's many false claims and errant statements, the lack of qualifications shown for their pilots, the lack of prep demonstrated by the organization itself, and the previous record of unsafe practices for which at least two of the UARC pilots received FAA violations and a suspension of their airmen privileges -- and that's but the tip of the iceberg -- making Whited's reaction mysterious and quite worrisome. ANN has attempted to speak to Whited a number of times in the last several weeks, after one short conversation succeeded very briefly in June (where Whited told ANN to contact the event's attorney and then hung up when the topic of David Riggs was brought up), but not a single one of our calls has been returned. Worse than that, media reports in local publications seem to suggest that Whited is attempting to place the blame for UARC's many failures on the back of the FAA... and based on ANN's evaluation of the last few months (and let's face it, we're hardly cheerleaders or apologists for the FAA), such claims are wholly without merit. ANN is proceeding with an extensive FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request for the documents, record s and communications surrounding this effort in order to make sure that the matter is properly documented and verified for the future.

In the meantime, the Camarillo airshow boasts a pretty solid line-up of legitimate and qualified airshow performers -- and the UARC pilots... who will fly an exceedingly docile profile that will require little skill and offer even less excitement or entertainment value (IMO). And if UARC actually behaves themselves and does what they are told, we hope for a safe event... but to be perfectly honest, there are a great number of folks associated with this effort who have grave doubts that the UARC pilots, and Riggs in particular, will fly as they are told.

We'll keep you informed.

ANN E-I-C Note: ANN thanks accomplished aviation photographer, Eric Van Gilder, of Van Gilder Aviation Photography, for the use of the UARC photos.

FMI: www.faa.gov, www.aviationcriminal.com, www.uarc.tv, www.airshows.aero, www.wingsovercamarillo.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.17.24)

"Sometimes, growth makes it easy to miss the little things, and today's "little guy" is smarting more than ever just looking at the price tags of "cheap" aircraft. Poberezny, seein>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.17.24)

Aero Linx: Space Medicine Association (SMA) The Space Medicine Association of the Aerospace Medical Association is organized exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 04.17.24: Feds Need Controllers, Spirit Delay, Redbird

Also: Martha King Scholarship, Montaer Grows, Textron Updates Pistons, FlySto The FAA is hiring thousands of air traffic controllers, but the window to apply will only be open for >[...]

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

Airborne 04.11.24: SnF24!, King's 50th, Top Rudder, Aileronics

Also: Flight Club, Jet Shades, MyGoFlight’s FlightFlix Acquisition FIFTY YEARS! What a milestone for the aviation world’s master aero-education duo! John, Martha, along>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC