Air Force Blames Army For MC-130H Mishap | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Mar 29, 2005

Air Force Blames Army For MC-130H Mishap

Says Army Should Have Marked Hole In Iraq Runway

You should've told someone. That's the gist of a USAF report on the total loss of an MC-130H Combat Talon II in Iraq December 29th. In essence, the Air Force blames the Army for not spreading the word on runway damage at a remote airfield in Northern Iraq.

As ANN reported in January, the aircraft, from the 16th Combat Wing based at Hurlburt Field in Florida, was landing at an isolated Army airbase in northern Iraq, when it dove into the hole. The crevice measured 86 feet wide and 73 feet long and was three-feet deep.

None of the Combat Talon's crew was hurt, but four soldiers in the hold were injured -- one suffering a broken leg, another undergoing treatment for a blood clot.

The SNAFU appears to have been the kind that makes military commanders both big-eared and bald ("You did WHAT??? Great googley-moogley!" said while cupping ears, slapping forhead and pulling hair).

Apparently, neither of the two Army units based at the field -- the 116th Rear Area Operations Center and an ANG helicopter unit from South Carolina -- reported the runway crater to the Air Force. Both units denied having any operational responsibility for the field.

An Army aircraft crew did report the problem -- but the report was "misdirected," according to the Northwest Florida Daily News. While Air Force crews that landed there in the daytime did share information on the hazard among themselves, no one apparently bothered to file a formal notice.

The price tag for that little bit of miscommunication? One MC-130H Combat Talon II valued at $85 million. Would someone please call the claims adjuster?

FMI: www.af.mil

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.16.24)

Aero Linx: International Business Aviation Council Ltd IBAC promotes the growth of business aviation, benefiting all sectors of the industry and all regions of the world. As a non->[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.16.24)

"During the annual inspection of the B-24 “Diamond Lil” this off-season, we made the determination that 'Lil' needs some new feathers. Due to weathering, the cloth-cove>[...]

Airborne 04.10.24: SnF24!, A50 Heritage Reveal, HeliCycle!, Montaer MC-01

Also: Bushcat Woes, Hummingbird 300 SL 4-Seat Heli Kit, Carbon Cub UL The newest Junkers is a faithful recreation that mates a 7-cylinder Verner radial engine to the airframe offer>[...]

Airborne 04.12.24: SnF24!, G100UL Is Here, Holy Micro, Plane Tags

Also: Seaplane Pilots Association, Rotax 916’s First Year, Gene Conrad After a decade and a half of struggling with the FAA and other aero-politics, G100UL is in production a>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 04.17.24: Feds Need Controllers, Spirit Delay, Redbird

Also: Martha King Scholarship, Montaer Grows, Textron Updates Pistons, FlySto The FAA is hiring thousands of air traffic controllers, but the window to apply will only be open for >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC