NTSB Unhappy With Boeing Over Dreamliner Comments | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Sat, Mar 23, 2013

NTSB Unhappy With Boeing Over Dreamliner Comments

Says Planemaker Did Not Inform Investigators About What It Intended To Say

The NTSB is reportedly unhappy with Boeing officials over the planemaker's March 15 briefing held in Japan outlining plans to get the airplane flying again.

In a letter dated Thursday, NTSB General Counsel David Tochen told Boeing officials that the plans discussed at the briefing were "inconsistent with our expectations" about the potential fix, and that Boeing did not inform the board what it intended to tell investors and others in Japan.

Bloomberg News reports that comments from Boeing executives appeared to be inconsistent with the public positions taken by the NTSB on the issue. In particular, Mike Sinnett, the chief project engineer for the Dreamliner said there had been no "thermal runaway" in the battery cells as defined by Boeing. The NTSB's report said that the battery fire aboard the JAL 787 in Boston was caused by "thermal runaway."

Sinnett also said there had been no fire inside the battery case, but NTSB spokesman Peter Knudson said that a fire hadn't been ruled out.

The board also took exception to Sinnett's depiction of what happened after the battery fire as the airplane responding to such a condition consistent with its design. He said the damage was limited to the battery and the function of the battery, but "the airplane was not a risk." He admitted that the battery failed, but "the airplane responded exactly as we had designed and intended.”

In January, NTSB chair Deborah A.P. Hersman said that “One of these events alone is serious; two of them in close proximity, especially in an airplane model with only about 100,000 flight hours, underscores the importance of getting to the root cause of these incidents.”

The FAA has signed off on Boeing's plan to re-test the battery system. DOT Secretary Ray LaHood said earlier this month that “(t)his comprehensive series of tests will show us whether the proposed battery improvements will work as designed. We won’t allow the plane to return to service unless we’re satisfied that the new design ensures the safety of the aircraft and its passengers.”

The battery system improvements include a redesign of the internal battery components to minimize initiation of a short circuit within the battery, better insulation of the cells and the addition of a new containment and venting system.

(Image of new battery enclosure provided by Boeing)

FMI: www.boeing.com, www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC