Where The Beagle Went Wrong | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Nov 03, 2004

Where The Beagle Went Wrong

Committee: Lack Of Funding Killed ESA Mars Probe

A British government report on the crash of the ESA's Mars Lander, Beagle II, says the project was so underfunded that it was little more than an "amateurish gentleman's agreement."

Beagle II was lost after it detached from its mothership, Mars Express, and impacted the surface of Mars last Christmas. The British Parliament's Science and Technology Committee slammed both the U

K government and the European Space Agency (ESA) for financially starving the project.

"ESA and the UK wanted a Mars lander on the cheap. As a result, the scientists had to go chasing celebrities for sponsorship when they might have been testing rockets," said committee chairman Ian Gibson. He was quoted in the UK Guardian newspaper.

Beagle II carried a painting by Damien Hurst for use in calibrating its cameras. The lander was supposed to signal touchdown with a riff from the rock band Blur.

In the end, the committee report said, the lack of structure in the project allowed a key financial backer, Martin-Baker Aircraft, to simply pull out of the consortium without penalty. Struggling to stay afloat, the Beagle II team paid more than $426,000 to marketing agencies in hopes of landing a sponsor, but received nothing in return.

In the end, Britain's Science Ministry bailed the project out with more than $40 million in British tax revenue.

The Beagle II team, however, led by Professor Colin Pillinger of the Open University, rejected outright the committee's characterization of its activities.

"It wasn't amateurish. How else do you get a group of people together when you haven't got a budget to offer them a contract?" asked Pillinger.

FMI: www.esa.int/esaCP/index.html

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.14.24)

Aero Linx: Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) The Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) is the Training and Safety arm of the Soaring Society of America (SSA). Our mission is to provide ins>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: 'We're Surviving'-- Kyle Franklin Describes Airshow Life 2013

From 2013 (YouTube Version): Dracula Lives On Through Kyle Franklin... and We're NOT Scared! ANN CEO and Editor-in-Chief, Jim Campbell speaks with Aerobatic and airshow master, Kyl>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC