House Panel Votes To Keep F-22 | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Jun 19, 2009

House Panel Votes To Keep F-22

Close Vote In House Armed Services Committee

By a 31-30 vote, the House Armed Services Committee agreed to keep funding for the embattled F-22 Raptor program, despite objections from the White House. While the Democratic chairs of both the HASC and the Air and Land Forces Subcommittee voted against the measure, Republicans managed to peel off enough Democrats to gain the narrow margin. House aides have said the bill will face a difficult time in the full House, and the Senate.

The amendment with funding for the F-22, authored by Utah Republican Bob Bishop, is attached to a more comprehensive spending bill. It would pay for the planes with money shifted from environmental cleanup at some military bases.

According to The New York Times, the bill appropriates $369 million for part for 12 new fighters. The vote comes at a time when some allies, most notably Japan, are expressing an interest in buying F-22's from the U.S., though current law prohibits their export. The Japanese government might have to pay up to $2 billion for the removal of certain stealth technologies from the planes they would buy. Japan has expressed in interest in up to 40 aircraft.

Republicans have been opposed the Obama administrations plan to halt production of the F-22 after building 187 of the planes, which cost about $200 million each. GOP leaders say the additional fighters are needed to insure against potential threats from major powers.

Opponents of the plane, however, point to the fact that it has not been used in either Iraq or Afghanistan, and say that it is an unaffordable cold war relic.

FMI: http://armedservices.house.gov/ 

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.21.24)

Aero Linx: JAARS, Inc. For decades now, we’ve landed planes on narrow rivers and towering mountains. We’ve outfitted boats and vehicles to reach villages that rarely se>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC