DOT Says Airline On-Time Performance Improved In February | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Apr 09, 2009

DOT Says Airline On-Time Performance Improved In February

Complaints Decrease As Well; Five Flights Stranded On Ground Over Four Hours

The nation's largest airlines had a higher rate of on-time flights this past February than in either February of last year or in January 2009, according to the Air Travel Consumer Report released Thursday by the US Department of Transportation. 

According to information filed with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), the 19 carriers reporting on-time performance recorded an overall on-time arrival rate of 82.6 percent in February, an improvement over both February 2008's 68.6 percent and January 2009's 77.0 percent.

The best performing airlines when it came to on-time arrival rates were Hawaiian Airlines, 91.2 percent on-time; Southwest Airlines, 88.3 percent; and Pinnacle Airlines, at 86.8 percent. Lowest performing carriers in this regard were Alaska Airlines at 76.3 percent; Comair, 76.6 percent; and Continental Airlines, and 77.7 percent of flights arriving within 15 minutes of scheduled times.

The dubious honor of "most frequently late flight" in February fell to Delta Air Lines Flight 2008, an MD-88 run from Savannah to Atlanta -- which arrived late at the gate 94.12 percent of the time.

In February, the reporting carriers canceled 1.2 percent of their scheduled domestic flights, a lower rate than both the 3.6 percent cancellation rate of February 2008 and the 2.3 percent rate posted in January 2009. Passengers also reported fewer lost items of luggage, and submitted fewer complaints.

Airlines filing on-time performance data reported .00009 percent of their scheduled flights had tarmac delays of three hours or more, down from .0002 percent in January. There were five flights with tarmac delays of four hours or more in February, the most egregious being a 259-minute delay for US Airways Flight 1165 from Philadelphia to Charlotte, NC.

When it came to cancelled flights, American Airlines scrapped the most in February, a full 2.2 percent of its schedule. Hawaiian canceled the fewest, just 0.1 percent.

FMI: Read The Full Report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.15.24)

Aero Linx: International Flying Farmers IFF is a not-for-profit organization started in 1944 by farmers who were also private pilots. We have members all across the United States a>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: 'No Other Options' -- The Israeli Air Force's Danny Shapira

From 2017 (YouTube Version): Remembrances Of An Israeli Air Force Test Pilot Early in 2016, ANN contributor Maxine Scheer traveled to Israel, where she had the opportunity to sit d>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.15.24)

"We renegotiated what our debt restructuring is on a lot of our debts, mostly with the family. Those debts are going to be converted into equity..." Source: Excerpts from a short v>[...]

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.16.24): Chart Supplement US

Chart Supplement US A flight information publication designed for use with appropriate IFR or VFR charts which contains data on all airports, seaplane bases, and heliports open to >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC