London ATC Head Says Proposed Thames Hub Is A Poor Airport Location | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne Unlimited-
Monday

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI-
Tuesday

Airborne Unlimited-
Wednesday

AMA Drone Report-
Thursday

Airborne Unlimited-
Friday

Airborne On ANN

Airborne 05.21.18

Airborne-UnManned 05.22.18

Airborne 05.16.18

AMA Drone Report 05.17.18

Airborne 05.18.18

Airborne-YouTube

Airborne 05.21.18

Airborne-UnManned 05.22.18

Airborne 05.16.18

AMA Drone Report 05.17.18

Airborne 05.18.18

Tue, Apr 17, 2012

London ATC Head Says Proposed Thames Hub Is A Poor Airport Location

Sits In The Middle Of The Flight Paths Of Four Existing Busy Airports

The head of Britain's air traffic service Nats says that the proposed Thames hub airport is in "the very worst spot" when it comes to moving airplanes around in London's busy airspace. Richard Deakin, Nats' CEO, said that Air Traffic Control was not taken into account when the $79 billion proposal was developed.

The British government will undertake a consultation on London's airports this summer, with the only option off the table being a third runway at Heathrow, according to an article appearing in the Guardian. Deakin told the paper that the proposed Thames Hub site sits under the flight paths of four of the city's five airports. He said the placement presents "serious challenges" to the integration of an airport into the air traffic systems.

Deakin, a proponent of the third Heathrow runway option, said construction of that additional runway at the existing airport would do more to cut CO2 emissions in the UK than any other option under consideration. He said the third Heathrow runway would eliminated most of the time flights spend in holding patterns waiting to land.

But the coalition which will make the decision is steadfastly against that third runway, and will not even bring it up at the meetings this summer. Deakin said that adding the Thames Estuary Hub would cause flight paths to be altered in a way that would increase emissions and raise the risk of bird strikes. He said it was a little surprising that no one apparently thought that a conversation with air traffic controllers might have been useful when designing an airport plan. (Image provided by Foster & Partners)

FMI: www.caa.co.uk/

Advertisement

More News

Old Data Reveal New Evidence Of Europa Plumes

Scientists Are Looking Again At Data Collected In 1997 Scientists re-examining data from an old mission bring new insights to the tantalizing question of whether Jupiter’s mo>[...]

WFPS Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Program To Take Flight

Aircraft Equipped With Thermal Imaging Cameras This June, the Winnipeg Fire Paramedic Service will launch its Unmanned Aerial Vehicle program, which will allow for safer, quicker, >[...]

Aero-TV: IXI Dronekiller - For When Good Drones Go Bad

Designed To Disable All Types Of Drones IXI Technology displayed its "Drone Killer" at AUVSI earlier this month. According to the company, the Drone Killer disables Unmanned Air Ve>[...]

ACI Europe & EASA Workshop For Aerodromes Planned

Will Be Held June 14 At Frankfurt Airport In Germany Few measures have proven more effective than the collection and analysis of data for building safety in aviation. Occurrence re>[...]

Canada Invests In Transportation Infrastructure In Nunavut

Will Support Projects At First Air Operations In Iqaluit And Five Airports The Government of Canada supports infrastructure projects that create quality middle-class jobs and boost>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2018 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC