Missile Defense Contract Goes to Boeing, Raytheon | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Jan 29, 2003

Missile Defense Contract Goes to Boeing, Raytheon

$¾ Billion: What Do They Know?

With the only countries that are both able and willing to mount a missile attack against the US sharing a border in far east Asia, the Pentagon's huge contract for "floating radar" may seem like overkill; but it's supposed to be operational in record time -- by Fall of 2005.

The concept -- using X-band radar units in the oceans to track incoming missiles and help coordinate countermeasures -- is old, and neglected, at least since the Soviet Union collapsed; but the size of the commitment, and the rapidity of the fulfillment, should raise eyebrows throughout the world's political and defense communities.

Raytheon and Boeing are to share the contract, producing the infrastructure as well as the X-band radar units. Whether the units will include dedicated ships, or be mounted in barges and towed around, has not been specified; the ultimate design will surely affect how the money is to be spent.

The Pentagon is not acknowledging any link between this program and the spotty performance of anti-missile tests, the latest of which was a the third failure in eight tests, in December.

Raytheon will supply most of the electronics; Boeing is looking to build the booster, with both Lockheed Martin and Orbital vying to supply the rocket motors.

Reuters reports that, "The plans call for an initial U.S. system with 16 interceptors at Fort Greely, Alaska, and four at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California by 2005." This seems to indicate that the Pentagon is looking across the Pacific, for the likeliest threat.

FMI: www.dod.gov; www.raytheon.com; www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC