Fuel Exhaustion Considered In Daytona Crash | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Jun 15, 2009

Fuel Exhaustion Considered In Daytona Crash

Pilot Says He Thought Plenty Of Fuel Was On Board

The NTSB investigation of the May 25th crash of an Aero Commander (file photo, below) in Daytona Beach, Florida, which killed one person and injured the pilot, is focusing on whether the airplane had sufficient fuel on board. While the preliminary on-site investigation did not find sufficent fuel in the tanks of the airplane, or odor of fuel on inspection, pilot Andy Clark told the Daytona Beach news Journal he checked the fuel before flight, and thought he had about 110 gallons on board. The person killed was Clark's father, 80 year old Port Orange businessman Doug Clark.

A condensed version of the NTSB preliminary report follows:

NTSB Identification: ERA09FA303
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Monday, May 25, 2009 in Daytona Beach, FL
Aircraft: AERO COMMANDER 500 S, registration: N73U
Injuries: 1 Fatal, 1 Serious.

This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed.

On May 25, 2009, at 0846 eastern daylight time, an Aero Commander 500S, N73U, operated by Commonwealth Aviation Corporation, was substantially damaged following a partial loss of engine power and collision with terrain, during a forced landing after takeoff from Daytona Beach International Airport (DAB), Daytona Beach, Florida. The certificated private pilot was seriously injured, and the pilot-rated passenger was killed. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the personal flight that departed about 0843, and was conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91.

Preliminary information from the FAA revealed that the airplane was cleared for takeoff from runway 7R. About 1 minute after takeoff, the pilot reported "an engine failure" and announced his intention to return for landing on runway 25R. Witnesses in the vicinity of the airport, approximately 1/2 mile off the departure end of the runway, reported the engine noise from the accident airplane was "surging" as the airplane passed overhead, and one witness described a "radical" turn back to the airport.

Two witnesses, at their motorcycle repair shop, stated that only one engine was running. They added that the engine was "revving," and would then "conk out" before revving up again. As the engine surged, the airplane would "shuffle left and right." One witness described the airplane "just hanging there" as it turned back to the airport. The airplane flew west out of view before it crashed on the 1,000-foot grass safety area prior to the approach end of runway 25R.

A preliminary review of radar data revealed that the pilot declared the emergency when the accident airplane was leveling off at about 1,000 feet, about 1.75 miles from the departure end of the runway. During the turn back to the airport, the airplane descended to 700 feet, then climbed back to 1,100 feet. During the descent to the airport, the data showed the airplane at 93 knots, 700 feet and 1 mile from the runway, and 90 knots, at 500 feet and 1/2 mile from the runway.

A review of FAA and pilot records revealed that the pilot held a private pilot certificate, with ratings for airplane single-engine land, airplane single-engine sea, airplane multiengine land, and instrument airplane. His most recent FAA third-class medical certificate was issued on July 17, 2007. The pilot reported 1,250 total hours of flight experience on that date. Review of the pilot's logbook revealed approximately 1,470 total hours of flight experience; of which, 570 hours of which were in the same make and model as the accident airplane.

The airplane was examined at the site on May 25, 2009. There was no odor of fuel, and all major components were accounted for at the scene. The airplane came to rest on flat, grassy terrain on the airport property, 267 feet prior to the approach end of runway 7R. The wreckage path was oriented 240 degrees magnetic and was 140 feet in length. The airplane came to rest oriented 360 degrees.

The wreckage was removed from the site and the examination was resumed on the parking ramp on May 26, 2007. Examination of the cockpit revealed that the left and right fuel valve switches and the left and right fuel boost switches were in the "on" position.

The fuel system had a capacity of 226 gallons, was serviced through a single port on top of the left wing, and the tanks were interconnected to a center fuel sump that fed both engines. The fuel cells were opened through access panels and each were intact and contained only trace amounts of fuel. The airplane was leveled, the drain petcock was opened at the center fuel cell sump, and 1 quart of fuel was drained. The sample appeared clean, and contained trace amounts of sediment and water.

FMI: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20090525X10534&key=1

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.21.24)

Aero Linx: JAARS, Inc. For decades now, we’ve landed planes on narrow rivers and towering mountains. We’ve outfitted boats and vehicles to reach villages that rarely se>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC